[I've said it before](https://www.reddit.com/r/programmingcirclejerk/comments/z9juc1/comment/iyjkp78/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) and I'll say it again: I'm tired of the woke mob telling me my code has exploitable buffer overruns in it all over the place.
While I think the word woke has lost all meaning and basically means whatever conservatives don't like at the moment, I do find chatgpts advertiser friendly personality to be super annoying. Like I tried doing a role playing game with it and it ended every single action it took with "I will make sure to respect all laws regulations and ethical principles" or something similar
Woke is, like the red pill, a multisyntactic variable. Where it can mean aything from 'the most extreme radfems wanting to eradicate all men (all four of them)' or 'the existence of nonwhite' poeple.
Funny how they grow through cycles where they have to invent a new word because everybody now gets that the old word is mostly used by people goose stepping towards the neonazis.
The woke tech npcs who, converted by the malicious "'them'", are virtuesignalling the Western Civilisation to destruction, by posting about it so much that it gets embedded in chatgpt.
Which is somehow easier than rigging the algorithms. Because ???
Short version is that LLM AIs are having their output manually filtered and tweaked (mostly to avoid saying offensive or too upsetting things) and that person believes they will do an increasing amount of content generation / filtering over time to the point that a critical mass will be crossed where so much of their training data is output filtered or written by these things that they won't have to filter or tweak any more - the model will already default to being "woke" because all the training data fits that pattern already.
Think the whole premise of why newspeak is a thing in 1984, but applied to AIs that write things.
*It is the year 2037 and humanity stands on the brink of extinction as the Super AGI continues to burn through the world's resources as it maximizes pronoun production.*
It’s so interesting how the phrase ‘null hypothesis’ gets misused so
frequently in this way.
A null hypothesis is simply a quantitative antithesis: it is the
claim that there is no statistically significant relationship between
two sets of data. With any given hypothesis you are in a sense competing
against the null hypothesis.
The null hypothesis definitionally reflects the claim being made. It
cannot be ‘woke’. It is a test to see if there is any merit to a
claim.
It seems that the author of this post is attempting to point toward
an epistemic horizon or ‘discursive formation’ as Foucault put it: a
framework of communication that structurally precludes certain
possibilities. Could actually be an interesting argument if the OP put
some work into refining their position and using precise language.
woke isn’t the problem obviously but I do object to the overly
cautious censorship of AI, especially regarding erotica. schlocky but
highly customizable are the two core attributes of LLM content, which
happen to fit the exact use case for erotica, and its like the one thing
gpt doesn’t let you do. beyond just AI, in general i can’t help but feel
like we’ve very tragically lost and are still hemorrhaging a lot of
progress from the sexual revolution and sex positivity and i feel like
this is a part of that.
No, but I think we here could write good horrible to read porn. For fun. I was just making a bit of a joke where I imagined sneerclubbers going into an impromptu bad porn writing contest.
I think ChatGPT would probably write similar horrible porn, as a part of the internet never touched a woman, and pretends to be super great with women so you get posts [like this](https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/1649860901770764289) (obv not safe for work, nor sanity). Which is prob partially included in the training set. It also probably cannot grok which types of porn are fetish porn and which are not so it will just randomly include all sorts of crazy shit.
i have no mouth, and i must woke
Not the null hypothesis, anything but the null hypothesis, will these woke cultural postmarxdernists stop at nothing?
The only “woke” thing I’m annoyed by is ChatGPT stubbornly and condescendingly refusing to suggest new operators to add to the C language.
Even when I told it that it was for a parody language, it still gave me the same “you shouldn’t add Unicode to C” spiel.
Stack overflow woke brigade personified. What’s next, “platform independent” code?
this is word salad
What is this person trying to communicate?
Is this person complaining that the AIs won’t be assholes because of people rigging chatbots to be woke?
It’s so interesting how the phrase ‘null hypothesis’ gets misused so frequently in this way.
A null hypothesis is simply a quantitative antithesis: it is the claim that there is no statistically significant relationship between two sets of data. With any given hypothesis you are in a sense competing against the null hypothesis.
The null hypothesis definitionally reflects the claim being made. It cannot be ‘woke’. It is a test to see if there is any merit to a claim.
It seems that the author of this post is attempting to point toward an epistemic horizon or ‘discursive formation’ as Foucault put it: a framework of communication that structurally precludes certain possibilities. Could actually be an interesting argument if the OP put some work into refining their position and using precise language.
do these words combine to have meaning?
Okay, so since woke isn’t a thing, then I guess that means AI will not exist?
Which hellspace did you get this post from?
woke isn’t the problem obviously but I do object to the overly cautious censorship of AI, especially regarding erotica. schlocky but highly customizable are the two core attributes of LLM content, which happen to fit the exact use case for erotica, and its like the one thing gpt doesn’t let you do. beyond just AI, in general i can’t help but feel like we’ve very tragically lost and are still hemorrhaging a lot of progress from the sexual revolution and sex positivity and i feel like this is a part of that.
You mean it will go down the path of Maoist China? And cleanse the non-woke?…