Human Biodiversity (HBD; also called race realism, white nationalism,
the red pill, identity politics) is a fun social game that can be played
in real time among close friends or in play-by-post mode on online
discussion forums. Turn any conversation about social mobility and
fairness into a grim realist acceptance of intractable biological
differences between groups of people. Race, gender, deviant sexualities
- the only limit is your imagination!
#Object of the game
Score points for your political ideology, or just for your
race/gender/ingroup, by hypothesizing some inborn unalterable difference
between groups that fully explains differences in their behaviors and
socioeconomic outcomes with no need to consider environmental or
cultural influences that might be possible to ameliorate with
progressive social policies.
#Rules
- You are welcome, even encouraged, to be uncertain and vague about
your claims. Remember, you’re just asking questions, foremost among
which is why won’t people even consider this? If someone tries
to pin you down on a testable prediction or definition, they’re missing
the point. You don’t have to play defense for challenging propositions
outside your bailiwick; fall back on a motley collection of facts that
everyone already agrees on. You are merely trying to open minds to the
options and gain intellectual credibility for the idea and its policy
implications; supporting evidence comes later.
- If you do cite evidence, it should be indirect and superficial. Blog
posts are the best sources because they’re not full of jargon and bias;
podcasts and YouTube videos are also encouraged, but they should be long
enough to explain things very thoroughly. Scientific journal articles
are allowed, but preferably self-published ones that don’t sacrifice
free speech to the thought-police of peer review, and you may not cite
information that isn’t written in the abstracts.
- Do not criticize another player for lack of scientific evidence or
credentials. Everyone knows scientists are a bunch of SJW ideologues
whom your brilliant thought-experiment probably hasn’t even occurred to,
so of course they’ve never gathered the data and they’ll make fun of you
for lacking an undergraduate intro-level understanding of the topic (in
the biased way they teach it).
#Examples
Here are a few to get you started:
- The male sex is an existential threat to civilization and
should be carefully regulated. The vast majority of violent and
sexual crimes are committed by men. Man-on-man violence is the
stereotypical scenario but it may even spill over into communities of
noble law-abiding Females. Years of Marxist-feminist attempts to reduce
the culture of toxic masculinity have failed to overcome this skew in
any way. As a thought-experiment I propose a moratorium on male
immigration, a national registry of all practicing heterosexual men and
their gathering places, and in the long run perhaps an experimental
archipelago of gendrostates in which these groups can live separately
without the mistrust that inevitably builds up where populations
artificially mix.
- The achievement gap is the result of centuries of
colonialism, slavery, and racism, through genetics. African
Americans tend to perform poorly on standardized tests compared with
other groups. This isn’t their fault; their ancestors were
systematically denied access to education, civil rights,
g-loaded careers, and other selective pressures for cognitive
ability. Even though racism ended ten years ago, they still can’t be
expected to perform as well as other groups that have evolved in a
culture of safety nets and effortless privilege, because the effects of
the previous environment are written in their genes. Unfortunately this
one has no policy implications because there’s no way to compensate for
the gene pool with social policy.
- Women are biologically predisposed to be leaders.
Scientific studies have conclusively proven that men are statistically
less likely than women to possess well-developed faculties of emotional
expression, verbal and nonverbal communication, empathy, and other
interpersonal skills. Thus if we stop trying to skew the gender ratio
with diversity programs, we may revert to a stable, natural situation
where 90% of politicians, CEOs, comedians, etc. are women, and that may
just be what a healthy meritocracy looks like.
- White Americans should pay an extra tax. Even if
race is skin-deep, as left-wing activists claim, skin matters. The
Anglo-Saxon race evolved its fair complexion in far northern latitudes
where sunlight is scarce. As such this tribe is totally maladaptive in
the populous regions of North America, which are much closer to the
equator. Hence an entirely unnecessary epidemic of sunburn, skin cancer,
fake tans, and other side effects of living outside their geographic
lane. Once again, hard-working brown Americans are subsidizing their wan
neighbors’ disadvantages, whether through private insurance premiums or
the Marxist redistribution regime of Obamacare, and that’s just not
fair.
- Governments should encourage miscegenation with eugenic tax
credits. The phenomenon of “hybrid vigor” is well known to
farmers, and it is equally obvious to all observers that social discord
is the inevitable result of multiple races inhabiting the same area.
Thus the state has multiple compelling interests in cucking its way to a
mixed-race society. Although it is of course unconstitutional in most
jurisdictions to outright ban same-race marriage, child tax credits and
other perquisites could be handed out more selectively to nudge
prospective parents toward the healthier path. Given its uniquely
problematic social boundaries, the dilution of the white race should be
an especial priority.
Your move!
[deleted]
The shaming & bullying of shy, sexually unsuccessful nerdy men is actually the compassionate position, as we must disincentivize the low-T from reproducing to ensure proper WARRIOR MALES are able to lead civilization.
It is well established that throughout human evolution, men have been the hunter-gatherers of the tribe. Men are unhappy today because we repress this natural instinct. We need to let men be gatherers again. At some point in the past 10,000 years, we men let the feminists and SJWs take over grocery stores. Ever notice how it’s always wives and girlfriends shopping for food? I propose we solve this by banning all women from grocery stores. Let’s return grocery stores and supermarkets to the male spaces they have been for thousands of years.
Having measured the contours of William Shakespeare’s skull very carefully (Warwickshire police: I promise I’ll return the skull once it’s finished its 6-week limited run as Yorick in my one-man show of Hamlet!), it’s clear that his degenerate low-class genes resulted in a a man of meagre wit and temperament who could have produced no more than 9 of his plays and 65.2857 of his sonnets authentically.
Most of the so-called Shakespeare’s works were obviously composed by a phrenologically superior specimen, almost certainly Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, though I speculate that The Tempest originated as one of Francis Bacon’s empirical experiments in which he banged the fingers of Christopher Marlowe’s corpse on a primitive typewriter until he successfully produced the works of Shakespeare. (Hence why the typeface Arial takes its name, albeit misspelled, from a character in that very play.)
I could never get this shocking truth posted on Slate Star Codex, because every time I mentioned the skulls, Scott Alexander would say “Yes, we’ve noticed the skulls!” and censor me immediately.
Given the overwhelming evidence for the heritability of general intelligence, as gathered by 2 or 3 in no way motivated authors, and given that obviously heritability equals genetics equals immutable biotruths, and given that general intelligence is clearly higher among white people than all other absolutely real and exact races in the way we classified them back in 1901, and given that we want society to be a meritocracy and not some molly-coddled SJW playground of niceness (although we are also in favor of niceness and civilization), I propose:
-The Bukkake Hypothesis: Partible paternity and runaway sexual selection
As Walker et al 2010 have demonstrated, the existence of multiple fathers in partible paternity systems of kinship can greatly increase fitness. In this paper, we develop the hypothesis that multiple evolutionary by-products arose from the adaptation for orgiastic partible paternity rituals. Human sperm has a number of relevant characteristics to our line of research. First, it has recently been observed that spermine causes the skin to soften and prevent wrinkles. Second, semenal fluid is well-known to be rich in protein. Females who drenched themselves in sperm would have been at an evolutionary advantage, gaining both nutrition and a more attractive facial features displaying decreased fluctuating asymmetry. During the Pleistocene, this would have selected for men with higher-quality sperm. We hypothesize that this explains the popularity of both the bukkake porn genre (Pornhub 2018) and women’s skincare products (Avon 2018). To test our hypothesis, we sampled 50 undergraduate students (25 male, 25 female). Each student was given a questionnaire to determine their overall interest in bukkake porn. Ejaculate was collected from male students to test for quality of semen. Female students were asked to list the total amount and cost of skincare products they used. For both experiments, interest in bukkake was correlated (p<.05) with quality of seminal fluid in men and use of skincare products in women.
It’s generally known that men have a naturally higher sex drive than women, which has caused all sorts of societal problems, especially as we’re not allowed to talk about it. However, recently it has been theorised that sexual orientation is actually caused by a “gay germ” rather than being genetic as the Cathedral’s dogma would have you believe. Clearly, we need to maximize the distribution of this pathogen among men, thereby increasing the degree to which higher male libido can be satisfied by other men, decreasing the burden of male sexuality on women and society, and bringing us closer to FALGSC.
Liberal elites are extremely economically productive. Economic productivity correlates with IQ. Liberal elites are also very unlikely to believe in HBD.
I conclude that belief in HBD negatively correlates with IQ. We should enact a eugenic policy of paying HBD believers to sterilize themselves.
It is widely known that in order for a species to survive, genetic diversity is necessary. Without genetic diversity, it can be hard for a population to evolve and adapt to changing circumstances, and diseases that affect people with certain genotypes are likely to be more deadly. The most genetically diverse human populations are those in sub-Saharan Africa, and thus in order to preserve human genetic diversity (and thus humanity itself), every effort should be taken to ensure their survival. Countries outside of Africa made up of people of largely European or Asian descent should be subjugated and their resources should be focussed on benefiting sub-Saharan Africans. Programs of extra-terrestrial colonisation (to allow humanity to survive even in the event of a cataclysmic asteroid or similar) should focus on spreading sub-Saharan Africans to other planets, and all other measures should be taken which ensure the survival of sub-Saharan Africans as the the most genetically diverse and resilient possible future of humankind.
So why can’t we have a frank, open conversation about how city dwellers are naturally smarter and more creative than their less urban cousins? It’s the only rational explanation for why the overwhelming bulk of economic development happens in metropolitan centers.
I’m not saying ruralites aren’t fit for work in a modern economy. In just saying that any prudent company who wants to set up a factory or farm or whatever should bring in competent management from out of town instead of engaging in some doomed feel good effort to hire and train a local.
That was literally Brazil’s eugenic policy.
This is pretty fantastic my dude.
Is this cheating?
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
looking at the lesswrong/“rationalist” community, it is clear many of them struggle with finding romantic or sexual partners- just look at this excerpt from what Scott Alexander wrote in “Radicalizing the Romanceless” on slatestarcodex:
from this, it is clear that this is because lesswrongers/“rationalists” are biologically gross and unfuckable. fortunately, there is no need to sterilize them to remove their undesirable genes from the gene pool, since they are already extremely unlikely to pass them on anyways.
The shift in computer science from being feeeemale dominated to male dominated in the 80s was due to rapid polygenic selection for general reasoning and computer skills brought on by the increasingly meritocratic system in the US (as shown by The Bell Curve). More tech skill = more money/resources = more mating opportunities = rapid selection for tech skills. This is clearly a much more parsimonious answer to the question of why demographics in computer science changed so rapidly compared to the SJW theory that marketing targeted boys with video games and home computers causing a generational ripple effect that also made computer science become a progressively less welcoming environment for women.
You should post this to metafilter. They’d have a blast with it.
/r/bestof
I suggest that all HBD proponents and opponents come to https://www.reddit.com/r/HardcoreRationality/comments/8emh2u/the_official_hbd_thread/ to have a fair debate on whether HBD is actually a real natural phenomenon.
So Smear Club proves they are racist. Good to know.