posted on April 28, 2019 11:16 PM by
u/beth-zerowidthspace
31
u/brokenAmmonite56 pointsat 1556497031.000000
advanced polyamory requires solving several NP-complete scheduling
and packing problems, and is therefore computationally intractable in
the general case. however, in recent years heuristic solvers for small-N
polyamory (N < 50) have advanced rapidly. in this paper, we advance a
new heuristic for simplifying polyamory, namely, buying a bigger bed
This just in: Joseph Smith, Mormon Prophet from the 1800s, had a
higher IQ, was more open, and more mentally stable than most polyamory
attempters today.
Credit where it's due, they apparently support women's suffrage.
That's... something. Not, like a lot, but it's a meaningful step up from a lot of the stuff that ends up on this sub.
Ah yes. I, someone with PTSD, a deep distaste for anyone who uses IQ
as an ethical metric, and five romantic partners, cannot possibly
actually be poly.
Because i dont know the papers and stuff myself. I am still impressed with the big Five Stuff. I have read The The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt. So can you explain or provide material about why it isnt that impressive after a closer examination.
It's somewhat interesting for what it is - but people trying to get much out of it (ie making it what it isn't) is just dumb. And they all try to get too much out of it.
I’ve been attending a local polyam meetup for ~9 years and running it
for ~6, and I can attest to you that you don’t need any of those things
to be polyam.
advanced polyamory requires solving several NP-complete scheduling and packing problems, and is therefore computationally intractable in the general case. however, in recent years heuristic solvers for small-N polyamory (N < 50) have advanced rapidly. in this paper, we advance a new heuristic for simplifying polyamory, namely, buying a bigger bed
This just in: Joseph Smith, Mormon Prophet from the 1800s, had a higher IQ, was more open, and more mentally stable than most polyamory attempters today.
Oh look, it’s Conservative Sex Nerd with another bizarre take
Ah yes. I, someone with PTSD, a deep distaste for anyone who uses IQ as an ethical metric, and five romantic partners, cannot possibly actually be poly.
[deleted]
Broseph is a such high decoupler, he doesn’t even bother to check wikipedia before spouting off nonsense
<3
I’ve been attending a local polyam meetup for ~9 years and running it for ~6, and I can attest to you that you don’t need any of those things to be polyam.
source: anecdotes
Ugh, I saw an economic history blogger I like interact with this guy and now it’s just irrevocably tarnished him by association for me
miller lost a bet and now he has to run the most embarrassing twitter account possible
or he has a bet with robin hanson to see who can run the most embarrassing twitter account, winner gets a million dollars
it’s the only explanation