It also [just springs up all over for them](https://www.reddit.com/r/badphilosophy/comments/bhbzu5/nick_bostrom_thinks_mass_surveillance_could_save/), due to the sort of seemingly evil instincts that you mention. It's really worrisome.
>Under Bostrom's vision of mass surveillance, humans would be monitored at all times via artificial intelligence, which would send information to "freedom centers" that work to save us from doom. To make this possible, he said, all humans would have to wear necklaces, or "freedom tags," with multi-directional cameras.
ok with the Orwellian ironic dystopian names, he *has* to be attention-seeking with this shit, right?
I often see Singer cited by libertarian socialists (generally very
specifically on the subject of animal rights) and it makes my whole damn
brain pulse and throb every time.
uGhgvaghGHAGHHG read THE GERMAN IDEOLOGTY. read the FUCKING GERMAN IDEOLOGYHYUHJHKKUOH MY GOIOD. if i ever get my stalinist authoriatarian power i will suspend all social relations, force everyone to IMMEDIATELY READ THE GERMNA IDEOLOGY before they can have them back again. PATHETIC.
I read Singer's "intro" to Marx and I was surprised how much he got wrong - usually the economics stuff. If I ever get enough time I might do some sort of longform takedown (I haven't read his other work).
Nothing I love more than being called 'carnist filth' for pointing out that people are letting sentimentality about animals seduce them into literal fucking eugenics.
[deleted]
I often see Singer cited by libertarian socialists (generally very specifically on the subject of animal rights) and it makes my whole damn brain pulse and throb every time.
Does this mean we can go back to eating meat now?
“I’m glad I wasn’t aborted. Therefore, abortion is bad. Checkmate, philosophers.”
/s