You'd think this would make them question their priors around any other news story they read that might rely on a few choice commentators.
But yeah, that's not going to happen. (Gell-Mann Amnesia for the folks who love naming biases)
I second this (and I have a blog you can pull scathing quotes from, plus BuzzFeed once interviewed me about rationalists so you’re behind the curve if you don’t call me)
^(For mobile and non-RES users) ^| [^(More
info)](https://np.reddit.com/r/botwatch/comments/6xrrvh/clickablelinkbot_info/)
^| ^(-1 to Remove) ^| [^(Ignore
Sub)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ClickableLinkBot/comments/gpbgg1/ignore_list/)
I’m just assuming it’ll be a puff piece with maybe a small minor rider about how some people don’t like them.
Largely the sentiment I see on Twitter at the moment: https://imgur.com/phly1u2
I saw that they think we’re going to collaborate with Metz in order to produce a hit piece.
That would be pretty funny, but I doubt its going to happen
Silly question, but given the content that these fine folks put out, wouldn’t a hit piece be redundant?
##r/SSC
^(For mobile and non-RES users) ^| [^(More info)](https://np.reddit.com/r/botwatch/comments/6xrrvh/clickablelinkbot_info/) ^| ^(-1 to Remove) ^| [^(Ignore Sub)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ClickableLinkBot/comments/gpbgg1/ignore_list/)
When/where did the news about the piece originally drop?