That was interesting, instead of concluding that genetic distributions across human races could be linked back to a combination of *more* preternatural races (were the Celts even real?), He defends "anti-racism"(the only thing keeping racism alive), as the only pertinent takeaway.
Anchoring human races at six i think is good though, no bizarre discussions about the Jews and "40 tribes of Israel" being the common ancestor to all Europeans.
Basic argument being: dog breeds are *artificially* selected, yeah, that's the point, so he doesn't deny that human conceptions of race create the race to begin with, both epistemologically and in reality, just that white people doing it is bad, because then maybe they could defend themselves.
Possibly the best "scientific" Gish gallop by white genocide enthusiasts I've ever heard.
"Race is only real when the bad white people do it" - great precedent guys, privileging white people that hard is sure to cause some beautifully confusing realizations. "First they came for" heavily in effect.
.
All you have to do to prove that "white genocide" is a conspiracy theory is to state, and vocally support in your public life that anti discrimination laws apply to whites favourably in their case when they are discriminated against *because they are white*.
This paper goes out of its way to redefine the framework so that that scenario would be *impossible under the law*.
I'm not the one who called the authors of the paper "white genocide enthusiasts", I don't believe in your conspiracy theory, and you have no proof for it.
tl;dr you have just been pwned with facts and logic™
Not sure if this is rationalism related.
But it sure doesn’t take long for neo-nazis to show up (radical centrist liked this of course)
literally figuratively a literal dog whistle
Just leaving this here:
https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12052-019-0109-y