r/SneerClub archives
newest
bestest
longest
3Blue1Brown has made a beautiful, jargon-free redesign of Bayes Rule. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lG4VkPoG3ko)
58

3blue1brown is just, like, a staggeringly good math channel. I’m always impressed by how he manages to make all these abstract concepts so visually intuitive, highly recommend to anyone trying to learn math concepts.

his linear algebra videos basically saved me in college

I like this video a lot, is it sub appropriate though? Grant’s whole shtick is to be unassuming and empowering of those who feel uncomfortable with math (rather than project some kind of sagely otherworldly-ness like most topics of this sub).

Or are we just appreciating someone rationally minded who is thoughtful and considerate?

That's how I read it, as an anti-sneer. Grant is great and if I had known about his channel during my uni days I might not have flunked out.
It's labeled nsfw, which is for stuff that's cool or in earnest (but that still has relevance).
Aah, cool!
I used nsfw. My thought is if you’re going to do battle with those who wish to lord over the world with math, a different interpretation can be eye opening.
The contrast of this against Yud's wordy, confusing explanation--one of his most-read essays--is stark.
This part is the sneer.
Actually, come to think of it, I think the discussion of odds framing vs probability percentage framing is actually quite relevant to the failed attempts at "bayesian updating" that happen among rationalists. When you are asked the probability percentage of an event like the AI apocalypse, the fact that percentages are between 1 and 100 already primes people to pick larger numbers. The true probability might be 0.000000001%, but it's a pain in the arse to even write that out, so priors are generally biased towards larger numbers. Also, when you have to "update", bayes rule is a pain in the arse, so a lot of people are just adding a percentage point or two. Whereas if you were thinking about odds, the question becomes: are the odds 1 in a thousand, one in a million, one in 10\^20? Which is a more sensible way of thinking about some of these extreme cases.

He also has some good videos on machine learning and AI that Yud should probably watch too.

When he rolled up his sleeves on Lex swoon swoon

Is the bayes rule fetishization like a fun way for the sneer-ees to pretend they are smarter than everyone else

In American Undergraduate education, Bayes Theorem is covered in the last math class most non-math majors take. I do not think this is a coincidence.
like, since it's the last thing they learned, they latch on to it?
It's the Final Boss of Math