GUys it's fine that I believe rape is fine and preferable for some women BECAUSE I BELIEVE IN MOLOCH. Should we be more charitable to people who insist others are unaware of their best choices because they are innate? I feel like that's sort of like raping someone of their agency, a persistent theme with these petty boys no doubt.
It's true, referencing others as "low status" individuals like humans are actual fucking peacocks is truly "egregiously obnoxious," however I've noticed the venn diagram of those who use the term aligns perfectly with the circle of men who think they are good with women but are actually bad with women. E.g. awkward assholes. See also: people who listen to Joe Rogan unironically.
It is unfortunate that nerds are natural born rapists and than women
hate nerds, we can have a good community that doesn’t involve rape
because there’s no rape.
I cannot figure out how to parse that. Are we sure this isn’t a GPT-3
bot run amok?
I think it's enabled by the bullet-biting attitude prevalent in the ratiosphere. This is what happens when a community decides that straight-up accepting the obvious problems in your edgy theory, instead of trying to deal with them, makes you cool. See also: negative utilitarianism.
It's also funny how closely the trend of embracing repulsive ideas clashes with that Chesterton's Fence thing Motte posters like to talk about.
"Look at this payout matrix...edginess has to have high payoff vs political correctness because—*check notes*—cancel culture and therefore this idea is true and totally rad because game theory and math"
“I’ve convinced myself that my rationalization for the existence of this fence is correct, therefore Chesterton demands I tear it down”
Also, “ratiosphere” has great mondegreen energy.
Since it has been removed, here is the linked comment.
This intensified because a lot of feminists seemed to focus on nerdy
guys or nerdy activities in particular. The venue where these unwanted
sexual approaches happened was always a comic convention or something;
the webcomics drawn about this (of course there were webcomics) always
featured the stereotypical nerd with a neckbeard and fedora.
I want to point out that this part makes intuitive sense to me,
because while it sounds horrible and would probably be linked by the
sneerers, there are very few things that are more horrible than having
children with a low status male (aka a nerd) for a woman, as far as the
evolutionary pressures of our ancestors is concerned. Being hit on by a
low status male and succumbing to his polite advances is way worse than
being outright raped by a high status male, in terms of the number of
grandchildren the woman has.
And so since most of our female ancestors had more grandchildren than
the women who aren’t our ancestors, and they achieved that by having an
heritable instinctive aversion to nerds in anything resembling a sexual
context, and feminists are mostly women (or were female at that time
anyway), I’m entirely unsurprised that this became a big source of
controversy.
This doesn’t mean that this sort of aversion is natural and therefore
a good thing, this doesn’t mean that women blindly follow their
instincts without a conscious input, this doesn’t mean that all feminist
arguments are motivated by blind instincts, or that being raped by a
high status male is actually good, and so on and so on.
I’m just pointing out that this is a thing that is very likely to be
true. And that it’s an inevitable but very unfortunate that the people
on the progressive side that says that there are certain things like the
implicit association bias and the like that we have to acknowledge and
try to overcome to make the world better for everyone entirely dropped
the ball on this issue where the plank was in their collective eye.
>And so since most of our female ancestors had more grandchildren than the women who aren't our ancestors, and they achieved that by having an heritable instinctive aversion to nerds in anything resembling a sexual context
I'm just picturing, like, a Gary Larson cartoon with a bunch of nerdy looking dudes standing around in the savannah and the caption "prehistoric nerds"
This sounds like the comment of someone so deep into their own... uh... subculture that they haven't even heard of what feminists are doing outside of it. It's a classic example of "I heard of two examples of something like this happening to someone who sounds like me, therefore it must only happen to people like me."
Anyway, it's funny how the world is full of nerdy nice-guy dads and their nerdy nice-guy kids after evolution eliminated all of them.
I mean, if you insist
Oh damn they banned that poor rapist apologizer. I guess it wasn’t the one-shot-kill for the incels he had hoped for?
His follow-up post makes even less sense:
I cannot figure out how to parse that. Are we sure this isn’t a GPT-3 bot run amok?
Holy shit. What the fuck is wrong with some of these guys?
This just gave me a case of the screaming whafucks.
Thanks I hate it.
This is your brain on 7 years of reading about the “sexual value marketplace” on theredpill.
I’m stuck on “succumbing to his polite advances”
Since it has been removed, here is the linked comment.
I want to point out that this part makes intuitive sense to me, because while it sounds horrible and would probably be linked by the sneerers, there are very few things that are more horrible than having children with a low status male (aka a nerd) for a woman, as far as the evolutionary pressures of our ancestors is concerned. Being hit on by a low status male and succumbing to his polite advances is way worse than being outright raped by a high status male, in terms of the number of grandchildren the woman has.
And so since most of our female ancestors had more grandchildren than the women who aren’t our ancestors, and they achieved that by having an heritable instinctive aversion to nerds in anything resembling a sexual context, and feminists are mostly women (or were female at that time anyway), I’m entirely unsurprised that this became a big source of controversy.
This doesn’t mean that this sort of aversion is natural and therefore a good thing, this doesn’t mean that women blindly follow their instincts without a conscious input, this doesn’t mean that all feminist arguments are motivated by blind instincts, or that being raped by a high status male is actually good, and so on and so on.
I’m just pointing out that this is a thing that is very likely to be true. And that it’s an inevitable but very unfortunate that the people on the progressive side that says that there are certain things like the implicit association bias and the like that we have to acknowledge and try to overcome to make the world better for everyone entirely dropped the ball on this issue where the plank was in their collective eye.
Reasons for divorce are topped by (73%) arguing too much
Woah there an incel rationalist.