r/SneerClub archives
newest
bestest
longest
66

Source: https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1420879136302669826?s=20

Start of thread:

https://preview.redd.it/vnvvn3xdpze71.png?width=619&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=acae5c28eb810b22c185b4f2458d4d7d256ae2af

Ah yes, the linear model. Good enough to justify funneling millions of dollars to MIRI, and good enough for objectively quantifying viability of partners.

https://preview.redd.it/klefgnzbpze71.png?width=588&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=7c14667dfb1eb349d9a13da8021254a76d9cd115

[deleted]

Hey I met my wife in an Aus/NZ librarian daily blogging challenge so yep this stupid nonsense that I myself took part in is a thing now.

And you may tell yourself, “This is not my beautiful statistical outlier”

*And you may find yourself in the shortest bin of a bar chart*

Its really weird to me that Aella is a real person tbh

Who knew when she was posting comical gnome porn that she would turn into a sex worker advocating rationalism?
Wasn’t she homeschooled? As someone who was also homeschooled, she definitely seems like a former homeschooler lol
Yeah, and in a super super fundie christian (quaker? mormon? something like that) family. She's talked about having like, insane levels of trauma from her upbringing. I wonder sometimes if the rationalism thing is like, the pendulum swinging as far away from *that* as possible.
It isn’t really that far.
I think the massive amounts of acid might have done more damage tbh.

This seems like such a miserable way to live your life and to try to find a partner. What are they even basing these percentages on?

Bayes rule, duh /s
Baes Rule
Oh, so it's a *bad* idea to artificially inject stress into a romantic relationship by "intentionally and rapidly escalating" while at the same time openly discussing how it's unlikely to work?
Of course you would say that [number 6.](https://youtu.be/a7LH__BPqSY)

Imagine not just dating 37% of your total estimated lifetime dating pool and then marrying the next partner that is better than all your previous partners. could not be me lmao 😆

Bit weird, but hope it works out for them both.

If the potential partner is OK with her posting weird shit like this about their relationship on Twitter, I’d say they’re at least a 60% match.

I’m gonna buy that to 70…no…75% !

Why not use a prediction market instead?

this is brilliant

“Congratulations! Yours is the first relationship to get a negative score on the Pritchard scale.”

But where does it sit on the Bristol

Being with someone based on how well they fit your strict set of criteria is kind of the opposite of love…

[deleted]

I use a 3d pie chart!

Meh this seems okay to me, just a bit eccentric. The numbers are clearly mostly nonsense, but maybe I can see how they help someone think through an emotional issue. It’s not so far from people who make pros/cons lists in relationships.

Sure, but the 15-20% figure is absurdly overly precise.
I mean, those people are pretty sad too. But giving your pros and cons list a disguise of accuracy, precision and veridicy can only the normal problems created by overthinking worse