Oh boy, I have a good one for you guys today!
So an EAer wrote about how we should believe in theism because there might be normative reasons for action, while simultaneously solving the realism/anti-realism debate! Honestly I’ve never seen a better piece of philosophy.
So to give a little context, their basic arguments goes like this:
This may be an unfaithful reconstruction of the argument but the basic sentiment stays the same. But yeah, this might just be a revolutionary result. /s
Above is the link if you wanna read it.
Weird comment
Ah yes pascals wager with extra steps.
Sorry if I come off as a dumbass, I don’t understand the article