Oh boy, I have a good one for you guys today!

So an EAer wrote about how we should believe in theism because there might be normative reasons for action, while simultaneously solving the realism/anti-realism debate! Honestly I’ve never seen a better piece of philosophy.

So to give a little context, their basic arguments goes like this:

1. Normative anti-realism gives no guidance about what to do
2. It *seems* like you should ignore all worlds where normative anti-realism is false, because reasons.
3. if you ignore anti-realism, realism remains
4. the only likely way for realism to be true is if God exists,
5. therefore we should act like God exists, because we have normative reasons for action.

This may be an unfaithful reconstruction of the argument but the basic sentiment stays the same. But yeah, this might just be a revolutionary result. /s

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/QESJnGfPKZtef6Qtv/even-non-theists-should-act-as-if-theism-is-true

Above is the link if you wanna read it.