Will the guardian issue a correction to its EA/ manifest/ FTX article?
manifold.markets
79% chance. The Guardian piece here: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/16/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-eugenics-scientific-racism Reportedly contains many factual errors: See https://x.com/ohabryka/status/1802563541633024280?t=8IhUv03x6PKq_r5MwLbPuA&s=19 Resolves yes if one or more of these are corrected (either by stealth edit, deleting the article or editors note) by the end of July.

WE DEMAND A CORRECTION TO uh various minor nitpicks

also we swear we totally didn’t get your email

bonus from thread:

I am having a lot of fun on Manifold, but if the team insists on inviting eugenics speakers to conferences, its probably time for me to leave :-/

What exactly is your objection to people exercising their bodily autonomy to implement voluntary eugenics?

    • deborahEnglish
      14·
      1 year ago

      But betting? There’s being an insider and then there’s profiting, and aren’t most journalists prohibited from trading or betting on their covered areas?

      • David GerardOPMAEnglish
        12·
        1 year ago

        but money is The Unit Of Caring

        yes, she literally nicknamed herself “money”

      • aioEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t it like not real money? Or have they changed that

      • EvinceoEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t prediction markets an attempt to turn insider trading into a productive part of society (or whatever the libertarians who love prediction markets conceptualize as society.)