Just curious to know if anyone has been using the same distro for multiple years/decades and what or if you have it takes for you to want to switch to a different distro?

      • markstos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I stuck with Ubuntu over a decade, but eventually Arch had several packages I was interested in that Ubuntu did not, plus the Arch wiki. I wanted to use Sway with several rofi/dmenu type utils, and Arch had a lot more of those packaged.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same. I had been using Ubuntu for over a decade for all of my Desktops, but had used CENTOS/Rocky for servers. Now I switched to Fedora for desktop which simplifies things since now only my Raspberry Pis use deb vs rpm.

      Snap is super frustrating and the gate-keeping of updates and features behind the Pro subscription is annoying. I don’t want to have an account if I dint have to. It’s just one more privacy violation waiting to happen with no real benefit to me even if it is free for personal use.

  • Trimatrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    When the Distro starts talking about enterprise features during the installation process (looking at you canonical)

  • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’ve been using openSuSe Tumbleweed on one device or another for quite a while now. Recently I switched my last device, so I’m officially 100% Tumbleweed. NGL, feels pretty good. I would, however, switch under a few circumstances:

    • openSuSe releases Tumbleweed clone with systemD alternative (like runit). I’ve tried Void repeatedly, but unfortunately never really fell in live with it.
    • openSuSe releases NixOS style immutable distro (not the current aeon or kalpa) based on Tumbleweed.

    Honestly, Tumbleweed is nearly perfect for me. It’s just that I’ve tasted what life without systemD can be like, and I goddamn miss it… I’m totally hooked on openSuSe products though.

      • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Boot times. I am the kind of person who shuts my computer (may it be a laptop or desktop) down, whenever I’m not using it. With systemD, boot times are generally kind of annoying; runit, however, completely changes this. It really feels amazing to turn a Void Linux system on, and have it boot in seconds, with just one screen of logs. On top of that, if you’re doing a arch-style install (like the Void Linux minimal install), runit is just much nicer and more ergonomic. The main point is really boot time though, which I think is improved due to adhering to the Unix philosophy and having much less bloat. Using a runit system reminds you of how bloated and slow (and kinda convoluted) systemD is.

        I’m also the kinda guy who spends hours optimizing my neovim config (~80 plugins, including LSP) for 20 millisecond start-up times. In the end, I still use Tumbleweed though.

  • deadbeef@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve changed distro’s a bunch of times personally and for business I have influence in a bunch of times in the last 30 odd years.

    Slackware -> Redhat -> Suse -> Ubuntu -> Debian.

    The reasons for each were ( as best I can recall ).

    Slackware to Redhat was just because a proper package manager made sense at the time. I think the Redhat releases were a bit more up to date too.

    Redhat to Suse was because Redhat stopped doing the free long term releases, the short term ones were too short to be workable.

    Suse to Ubuntu was a similar thing to Redhat with Suse trying to push you into the enterprise version.

    Ubuntu to Debian most recently was due to the Ubuntu releases coming with more and more unwanted crap, we had been running mint on desktops to avoid whatever their mutant gnome reskin was called and then their regular gnome releases, but we were still running regular Ubuntu on servers. Eventually when they started putting pretty core stuff in snaps we decided to move to Debian.

    Hopefully that is the last migration we have to do for a while.

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I moved from Redhat when they started pulling the shit around getting paid for their source. I understand why they did it, but I disagreed with that choice and I moved.

    I quit Ubuntu when I finally had enough of their insistence on their way for everything such as firefox via snap, sure I can and did work around their shit, but why the fuck should I?

    I would move from Opensuse if they did something similar, if it became unreliably maintained, or if something much better came along.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love my Tumbleweed install. It is rolling and new while also being rock solid. But I do have the itch to try new stuff which j do sometimes

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah I have the same impression of it, although the volume of some updates, even when I update daily, can be a little off-putting.

        I wont move unless I have a good reason to, inertia over the effort to change when bored is too high

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Similar to other users - repos go down or corporate stuff starts to creep in.

    As long as I get to maintain agency over my system I’m pretty content.

  • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I used to distro hop all the time until I settled on Tumbleweed. I used that for eight years until Suse bared their corporate teeth and I got fed up with being two generations behind on the Nvidia drivers. I’ve been using EndeavourOS for almost a year and don’t see me moving any time soon.

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    The ability to wake up the laptop from sleep.

    Damn, do I regret going with Fedora. Anything newer than kernel 6.10 (which I salvaged from Fedora 39) and my laptop doesn’t wake up from sleep anymore.

    But changing distros is a hassle and idiot me went with a single partition for system and data, so migrating to another distro requires me to actually backup everything, so I haven’t done it yet.

  • dukatos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    There was a power loss, my PC was on UPS for some time and UPS battery started running low. I initiated the shutdown and systemd stopped it because it could not find a network share on the already stopped server. It didn’t gave up so I ended with fucked filesystem because the battery died. Switched to systemd free distro the day after.

    • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That sucks!

      I’m on Ubuntu, which I admit is not a popular option around here. But when my power goes out I use apcupsd and a network component to alert my attached or networked Ubuntu machines. When the power first goes out all of my non-essential machines automatically shut down gracefully. When the backup batteries get low enough (I have several separate APC units around the house) my essential machines also shut down automatically.

      When the power comes back up one of my machines automatically powers up and runs a few checks before turning most of my other stuff back on.

      I have very few power issues which last long enough for my batteries to run out, but when I do the only evidence is a few alerts and the fact that I have to log back into everything. All of my windows restore on my GUI machines, and no filesystem issues occur. It’s more seamless than when I ran Windows, granted that was 25 years ago.

      I’m similarly not a fan of systemd, but for backup battery and power management it seems to do the trick.

        • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That makes sense.

          The last time we had a power issue and I was at my desktop I didn’t get any GUI notifications of the outage, so that’s a miss.

          However the incessant beeping coming from every APC in the house was enough to tell me that stuff was about to go really sideways 😂 I was able to manually power down my desktop before the systemd stuff kicked in.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been settling on Linux Mint more and more as my generic workhorse distro. I have the least amount of issues with it out of the box compared to any other desktop distro.

    It’s clean, relatively low bloat, includes codecs and drivers for basically everything I’ve ever needed to use/do, and Cinnamon’s only crime as a DE is looking kind of boring. But it’s easy to select a new theme, so not really a huge issue either.

    I use a bunch of different distros for different purposes, but if you held a gun to my head and made me pick a distro I had to use exclusively for the rest of my life, it would be Mint with Cinnamon.

    If something was to replace it, it would have to be even cleaner, simpler to setup, and have even better general stability and compatibility.