You must log in or # to comment.
i’m not using the death of a white supremacist to make kissy faces at fucking people who spent the last four years calling for the death of trans people.
also fucking glad i blocked gavin on bsky
He was often called a white supremecist in debates and always challenged people to tell him what he had ever said that reflected that, and no one ever had an answer. He was a lot of things, but I don’t really think he was that. Do you have an answer? If he was, I would want to know, fuck racists.
It depends on how you define “white supremacy”. He definitely held the view that western (white) culture is superior to other cultures. He just also proclaimed that “racism is bad” at the same time, in order to pretend that he was making these points from a reasoned perspective.
Idiot.
deleted by creator
I got a better one
Woah hold up. That seems like too good of an idea for democrats
Cause it is. They won’t do it.
Any of Charlie’s ideas that were tested through good-faith debate never survived. He and many others of his kind tend to avoid that kind of discussion.
Big “I was told there wouldn’t be fact checking” energy.
Yeah, he was literally in the middle of blaming gun violence on trans people through pure intellectual dishonesty right before he died.
As an atheist, I put it on the shelf of “maybe could be evidence of divine intervention”. But of course then I’d have to ask where has he been all these other times?
Good faith debate made me laugh, the dude was literally in the middle of moving the goal posts when gukrackk
As a trans person, fuck Gavin newsom
You know he’s baiting right? Or are you this dense. Everything he mentions is the opposite of what Kirk did.
He was friends with Kirk and talked together on a podcast, at least once. It’s not bait.
If the Democrats run this guy in 2028 the country is over.
Uh… it’s already over. The Fascist Fuck sitting in the POTUS seat has already been trying to tell you this…
In any case, even in a non-rigged election, Newsom would get trashed just like Clinton.
If we even get to vote in the mid terms it’ll only be because the full roll out isn’t done yet.
The Red states are already voting in the midterms by preemptively choosing whose votes matter.
They just redistricted my state to ensure their wins… gods willing hotwheels finds a luigi
Clinton barely lost, mostly because idiots proclaimed that there was no point in voting because the system was already beyond repair.
Sounds like she sucked at making people believe she would make a difference, which given this is killary “we came we saw he died” KKKlinton who’s husband is behind the “tough on crime” bill that is largely responsible for the size of the current prison inmate population in seppoland is completely understandable. Get better candidates or stop being surprised why no one would show up to vote for you.
Wild that your argument hinges on Trump being the better candidate, as slightly more people showed up for him (in specific states).
How? His strategy wasn’t based on motivating minorities to vote for him but Hillary’s was. He appealed to the racists and won, and she tried to make the case that she would improve things and failed.
Well your argument seems to be that people will show up for a better candidate, and people showed up for him.
Ergo, you think he was the better candidate.
Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to participate unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you dont actually have do anything difficult to make things better yourself.
If you wait for perfection to happen without you, it will never come. You have to fight for something better. Sometimes that means settling for something that’s not good enough yet so that things can get better later.
Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to participate unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you dont actually have do anything difficult to make things better yourself.
I dont get why everyone assumes this? I’m not in Seppoland but will always advocate for organizing with the PSL or DSA. That’s how NYC got Mamdani in position. Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to do anything unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you can then just vote for it.
Sometimes that means settling for something that’s not good enough yet so that things can get better later.
I mean thats basically your strat right? Keep voting for these candidates, Killary, Genocide Joe, Bomber Harris, now it looks like it could be gruesome newsom, until somehow, magically a good candidate that will fix everything comes along.
deleted by creator
it’ll be over then
it’s over now, too. but it’ll still be over then.
?
The states are already over. I think that what’s he said
They absolutely are not lol. Countries can coast for decades like this. See Russia. Also the United States has been in worse places than it is now.
I already pulled my $85.44 of investments out of the American stock market. Its over for you guys the funding is cut!
Gas prices gon’ go up because of you
The states aren’t over but the idea of American democracy is basically dead. The govt is just really fucking broken. Sure the country exists and will continue to do so, but the systems are clearly broken, corrupt, and rotten beyond the capability of the modern political reality to fix.
As far as I can see best we can hope so is dramatic reform, like many many new amendments that completely change how the govt works to the point where it’s questionable if it is really the same govt. And the sadly more realistic outcome might be that reform either won’t happen or will only come after much suffering and conflict
You don’t get tongue in cheek humor, do you?
Are you saying that Newsom is being sarcastic in the post?
“Continue his work”…
I almost hate liberals more than open fascists. At least they admit they want to kill you rather than just casually enabling it in the name of some twisted and perverse form of civility. Republicans want you in death camps, democrats want them to file the right paperwork first.
Yeah, sure… the MAGAs are an excellent example of Good Faith Debate 🤦
Charlie Kirk, famously a good faith debater lol
What a fucking tool
Pretty funny if you read the tone as sarcastic.
Don’t give him the Trump treatment and rationalize his words in a way that are more acceptable to you. Words in general, but especially from politicians, should be taken at face value without an obvious reason to do otherwise. Newsom gives no indication here that he means anything other than what he’s literally saying.
I know. I was joking. I forget sarcasm isn’t clear from text.
Damn. If he followed internet convention with the /s, I would be rolling. But from what I know of him, I believe him to be sincere.
I laughed and assumed it was sarcastic.
Lol, it was. Everything he mentioned was the opposite of what Kirk did
The key phrase being “in a democracy.” Are you sure that’s what you guys have?
The only time I’d “reach across the aisle” for fascist dipshits is to smash them in the face with a brick.
Somebody get this dip shit a history book.
And there will still be people wanting to prop him up as presidential material
