• -RJ-@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        1 month ago

        Why would any country need that many? I mean having any is stupid because it will always end in mutually assured destruction but with that many, you could kill us all if you were on the verge of one hitting you.

        • Rakonat@lemmy.worldEnglish
          17·
          1 month ago

          Stupid, legacy calculus but calculus none the less. During the Cold war both sides recognized that a direct or near direct hit on a launch site could potentially negate any chance for retribution or follow up attacks in an otherwise limited/not all out scenario. So they counted the delivery mechanism they could identify, did some multiplication to account for misses and defenses and came up with a number. Then the other side noticed the build up, comes up with same general calculus and runs the same general math to decide how many they need. And this the goes back and forth for decades where each side is building up counters to their rivals counters. And the numbers we have now are actually a reduction from the peak of the Cold war build up.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          8·
          1 month ago

          It is mutually-assured destruction. The idea is that there are enough nukes to end all life on earth. Because if there are that many nukes, then nobody would ever use them.

          That’s how the US and USSR came up with these figures when they were disarming at the end of the Cold War.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      2·
      1 month ago

      Yes but in what condition? AFAIK most of them are from Cold War times and the Kremlin deliberately suppresses any information on the state they’re in.

      So, America can destroy earth 100-fold, but Russia can destroy it 110-fold - at least until one of them backfires.