Even for people that aren’t too knowledgeble or care about it, it’s usually a good indicator if it’s a “bad thing” when the ministers themselves are exempt from what is being proposed.
“Rules for thee but not for me” specifically needs to be outlawed. Anything the ruling class wants to impose on the people gets the same rules applied to them.
Meaning they still don’t understand that it’s morally disgusting to scan everyone’s private communications. They’re just annoyed that people care.
Their proposal should be explicitly outlawed, privacy should be a human right.
Yeah, it happens surprisingly often.
Even for people that aren’t too knowledgeble or care about it, it’s usually a good indicator if it’s a “bad thing” when the ministers themselves are exempt from what is being proposed.
“Rules for thee but not for me” specifically needs to be outlawed. Anything the ruling class wants to impose on the people gets the same rules applied to them.
But we all know that never happens.