ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoSchrödinger's marriage rulediscuss.onlineimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1794arrow-down10
arrow-up1794arrow-down1imageSchrödinger's marriage rulediscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squareTyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoHmm, no they’re also hypocrites, it’s not mutually exclusive
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThey are not hypocrites if they don’t believe in any of the stuff in the first place. Which they don’t. None of them do.
minus-squareTyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThat’s a pretty fair assessment, is it hypocrisy if you’re not aware of the irony, I would argue so, but your point still stands, they don’t care for the truth at all. If they did, they might have to contend with the fact that they are monsters
Hmm, no they’re also hypocrites, it’s not mutually exclusive
They are not hypocrites if they don’t believe in any of the stuff in the first place. Which they don’t. None of them do.
That’s a pretty fair assessment, is it hypocrisy if you’re not aware of the irony, I would argue so, but your point still stands, they don’t care for the truth at all. If they did, they might have to contend with the fact that they are monsters