• Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    25 days ago

    An “autonomous” car cannot be held accountable, therefore an “autonomous” car should never fucking go near a freeway

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 days ago

      There wouldn’t be a need for an autonomous car to go on a freeway if we had decent intermodal public transit.

      Just have cars like these patrolling the suburbs and picking people up for light/commuter rail, then a hub where you could get within a block of anywhere with no more than one transfer.

      High Speed rail if you need to get to another urban center from there.

      That’s the dream, at least.

      Nobody wants to use public transit, because it’s starved dry. Nobody wants to invest in public transit, because nobody uses it. Everyone just drives, because everyone has cars. Everyone has cars because public transit is terrible.

      But I do long for the day that this could pick me up and take me to the bus station/commuter rail stop.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 days ago

      Define “held accountable”?

      If you mean who will pay out if there’s an accident, presumably Waymo will have found an insurer willing to cover them. But if you mean that someone out there must be punished to satisfy some sense of vengeance, then you may want to re-examine your values.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        How about faces the same punishment someone that isn’t an incredibly rich corporation would face? If that’s insurance then sure, if thats jail time then yes someoen should be punished just like anyone else would.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          Jail should be reserved for cases where there’s intent/malice, or significant negligence. For example, drunk or aggressive driving qualifies, whereas speeding and most fender benders don’t. An automated system likely doesn’t qualify, so restitution should be sufficient.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yes I did mean punished. Specifically whipped, in fact. With brake cables.
        What’s wrong with my values ???