Never worry about commie crap like public citations getting in the way of misinformation rhetoric again! (Because the LLM trained on fuckin twitter made it up lmao)

On the flipside for an actually cool non-cucked integration of LLMs with wikipedia check out this post on the localllama where the person shares their project of using a local private llm to search through a local kiwix server instance of wikipedia. https://piefed.social/post/1333130

    • Harvey656@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 days ago

      It would be so funny if someone hacks the site and only changes that, and nobody notices for weeks…

  • Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    21 days ago

    Rather ironic given that wikipedia makes a massive portion of LLM training corpus

        • SmokeyDope@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          20 days ago

          … I really hoped that this wasn’t a thing, but im not surprised in the least.

          SY6H1alkDVgAXzw.png

          Its just fucking painful, man.

          nV1Dk50cInoWiFA.png

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            20 days ago

            Tge thing with conservapedia is Poe’s law makes it impossible to moderate. A conservative (heh) estimate is that 70% of that site is trolling.

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s from a book I love, Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land. The word is the Martian term for fully understanding something.

    • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      20 days ago

      I believe it is from the book stranger in a strange land. Its meaning is like to deeeeply understand, I think.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Not deeply but completely and absolutely.

        Grok means to understand so thoroughly that the observer becomes a part of the observed — to merge, blend, intermarry, lose identity in group experience. It means almost everything that we mean by religion, philosophy, and science and it means as little to us as color does to a blind man.

    • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      Doesn’t anyone remember groklaw? I feel like sometimes only I remember the early Internet anymore…

      • athairmor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 days ago

        I fully expect the SCO case to be resurrected at some point in this timeline. Then they’ll know.

    • LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      Funny you say that. In Serbia, they say the noise a pig makes is “grok”. My wife burst out laughing when she found out the name of Elon’s AI.

      Imagine some Saudi prince launches an AI called Oink, and then sets up Oinkepedia

    • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      I always assumed Grok was chosen to hint as his technology background. For which “grok” is a popular term used for reading and understanding, with code in particular.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s a Heinlein - “stranger in a strange land” concept. It sort of spread out in nerdery from there where it meant you know and you’re in the know.

        To know is to understand fully sort of. He’s doing the literal opposite which is a bit 1984 of him and is also likely another book he’s read and didn’t understand or at least had pretended to have read.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    If you have to create a wikipedia alternative to stop being fact checked, then maybe you are just fuckin wrong.

    Billionaires: “No, No… I can’t be wrong. I’m Rich! I’ll create a microcosm of information that warps reality to make sure I’m right!”

    Conservapedia: Wait…thats what I was for… what about me?!

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    Elon is one thing, but the Grok developers have recently done a surprisingly good job at making it neutral and unbiased in matters of opinion, but also allowing it to tell people they’re wrong in matters of fact, which is why there’s so many screenshots around of conspiracy theorists getting shut down by it.

    I can’t say whether this will be the same, but if the devs take “without bias” to actually mean “without bias,” rather than what Elon intends it to mean, it could actually be somewhat useful to filter out obvious promotional content and any small levels of bias.

    • lavander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 days ago

      No, the articles are reliably allucinated by Grok… with a sprinkle of editing for making sure the echo chamber is air tight