• teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    17 days ago

    Segregated anything is fucking dumb. Segregated internet communities are especially fucking dumb because anyone can be anyone on the internet.

    • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      17 days ago

      Congratulations, you’re the man they’re trying to forget exists for 10 fucking minutes a day in their off time!

          • teft@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            17 days ago

            Funny how some people downvote even the most innocuous comments.

            You can assume my gender or race all you want. It doesn’t make you right.

            • 4am@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              17 days ago

              So based and repelled bro. You’re for sure postmaxxing. Absolutely mewing on the haters. more dunks than a 90s kangaroo. You sure told those bitches.

              Anyway to be serious for a moment: “the internet is full of wreckers so why even bother” is a fucking wrecker argument. You are the problem. Do you see?

              • teft@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                17 days ago

                I think you’ve replied to the wrong person since my comment is about assuming genders of people on the internet not wreckers on the internet whatever that might be.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              17 days ago

              I downvoted because it was a deflection that didn’t address the very real issue presented to you

              • teft@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                17 days ago

                The issue being what? And how did I deflect? I refuted their comment, that’s not a deflection, that’s showing how dumb it is to claim you are anything since people can claim to be anything on the internet.

                Now I’m a ghost and will start a ghost only community.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 days ago

            Give up, brah: you lack conclusive proof. Lemmy doesn’t require ID verification, so anyone can be anything.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      17 days ago

      A segregated internet would be more like if they had a whole version of Lemmy for all topics but only for women, and then didn’t also participate in the other one.

      This is just one community calm the hell down they can have their space.

      • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        17 days ago

        If they want their own space, they are just bigots. That’s what they called me when I excluded them from the general space in the past!

        -the people arguing against that comm, probably

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Fuck em. “Oh but it’s a free Internet people can participate wherever they want”

          Yeah you have a right to be a total dickwad and scream in people’s faces at the grocery store, don’t be surprised when everyone thinks you’re an ass though. They don’t want your input. That. Simple.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      17 days ago

      Also I wonder how it would look if we made a Men’s Club community where only men were allowed and women were openly mob-scolded for participating. Would probably be considered a pretty sexist environment.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Literally nothing is stopping you from creating a community for men with a rule that only men participate. The difference is that in the community you’re thinking about though, women wouldn’t be constantly trying to mess with it. There are hundreds of communities to choose from. We’re not entitled to participate in them all.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          17 days ago

          The major point isn’t whether or not it’s possible to create it. The major point was that it would be considered sexist, I imagine. Or at the very least a little cringe.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          women wouldn’t be constantly trying to mess with it

          Is someone purporting to speak for all women? Seems arrogant.

      • Rooskie91@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        17 days ago

        The mens club you’re talking about DOES exist though. Since men are not a marginalized minority, that club is just called society.

        Your logic mirrors asking, ‘Why not create a whites-only club?’ Technically, you could, but people would rightly view it negatively because white people, as a group, are not marginalized. Exclusive spaces for minorities exist to provide relief from the discrimination or bias they routinely encounter. For groups that do not face those barriers, everyday society already functions as their ‘exclusive space,’ which makes it difficult for non-minorities to understand why others might need a separate environment.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          We’re talking about Lemmy communities here, having a men’s-only space to discuss men’s issues is totally fine. Also, demeaning men’s-only spaces and placing men in a uniform category as “the oppressor group” is awful for society

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              17 days ago

              Ok, let’s walk through the implication.

              -Women are oppressed.

              -Men are not oppressed.

              Who again are you saying is doing the oppressing? You’re blind to the fact that most men are also oppressed, and pretending that men can just go out in society and be safe being vulnerable is willfully ignorant

              • Rooskie91@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                23
                ·
                17 days ago

                You’re putting words in my mouth and confusing the difference between a demographic and an individual. AS A DEMOGRAPHIC, women are oppressed. AS A DEMOGRAPHIC, men are not. We’re talking about statistics here, not individual experience.

                The fact that some men are oppressed does not imply men are equally or more oppressed than women.

                The fact that women AS A DEMOGRAPHIC are oppressed and men AS A DEMOGRAPHIC are not does not imply all men are oppressors. It DOES imply that men opress women, but like… fucking duh? If men aren’t pressing women, then who is? It doesn’t mean all men are oppressors, but are you seriously going to sit her and act like the majority of domestic abusers, sexual harassers, and discriminators AREN’T men???

                You’re interpreting a defense of women exclusive spaces as an attack on individual men. You should unpack that.

                • Axolotl@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  Well then not all man are oppressed isn’t that okay to have a man-only communty?

                  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    I guess I was a little to aggressive in my original comment. I meant to explain why minority only groups get less flack than majority only groups, not to suggest that men only groups shouldn’t exist.

                    Women only groups exist alongside the people who disapprove of them. I don’t see why men only groups can’t. As many have pointed out, however, men only groups DO exist. Someone linked to dull_mens_club as a Lemmy specific example, but more broadly, fraternities exist. Battered mens groups exist. I think some groups like nights of Columbus and the masons are or were men only. Men only schools and colleges exist, as do women only. Most veterans organizations are primarily men just by nature of who makes up the majority of most militaries.

              • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                Men are also being oppressed by the societal norms. Sure. Thing is, the severity of such oppression is not on the same level, and while real, is not a valid comparison to female oppression.

                The oppressor is patriarchy, both men and women enforce it. Not everyone, but many. The way our societal norms, and other people in society peer pressure us into boxes is oppressive, and again, while men also are affected negatively by it, it’s just not comparable.

                So yeah, you made up that implication due to, and this is me being benign here, your misinformed self. Given that the percentage of male/female users on Lemmy being so male skewed, its effectively a men only online space. Let women have their women only online spaces.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 days ago

          Society doesn’t allow women? And openly scolds them for participating? I dunno. It’s “similar”? I guess? Anyway, the other person makes a lot of the points I would make too so I’ll let y’all hash that out amongst yourselves.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            17 days ago

            If 99.9999% of users are men, it’s effectively a place where men can express themselves without the fear that some women will flood the comments.

            That’s what women want with their women only spaces. And while that man wasn’t being that rude, until women feel more comfortable let them have their bubbles.

            • salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              If 99.9999% of users are men, it’s effectively a place where men can express themselves without the fear that some women will flood the comments.

              The point of the community is to share the dull things you’ve accomplished, not to go there and talk about stuff with the expectation that only men will respond. I was trying to tell that commenter that, despite the name, it’s not trying to be a man-only space, and people hopefully should not react to or expect the community to be as such. I just wanted to clarify since I think the comm is cool.
              There’s another similar community called !dullsters@dullsters.net if anyone objects to the name itself.

              That’s what women want with their women only spaces. And while that man wasn’t being that rude, until women feel more comfortable let them have their bubbles.

              I agree with you.

      • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Hey, go for it! If c/mensliberation became men-only, I’d support them! There are some communities where women wouldn’t have anything to contribute, and that’s okay and wouldn’t be sexist.

        But just don’t go full kiwifarms with a men-only community and I’d say that’s fine.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’m not interested in a men’s only club. How very boring. What would we talk about that women wouldn’t be able to join in on the conversation? I never understood that. Women’s perspectives are valuable, just as any person’s perspective. 👍

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        I know I’m sending mixed signals, but those things are not equivalent. All of modern society is patriarchal and women face exclusion from spaces their entire lives because of their sex or gender. Things have improved slightly over the decades but this kind of misogyny is still a global pandemic. When men are called privileged this is why. That ignorance is a privilege. Lucky you, that you haven’t experienced this constantly for your entire life. Want to create a “Men’s Club” community? We’ve all been living in it our entire lives. Nothing new to see there.

        I still feel dirty thinking about the womensstuff community, though. The first time I stumbled in there I had no idea where I was and someone said “As a man…” and then asked a question, and they were told to be quiet. Women experience that constantly, and it’s worse for girls. So much worse. Especially if you are the chatty type of autistic that I am. Having experienced it, I would never subject others to that. I felt that interaction viscerally and immediately blocked the community. I understand wanting to have a safe space, and I do have those with certain private groups, but seeing that behavior was awful. Even queer spaces are welcoming to allies, and I feel inclusion of allies in all social matters is critical for progress to happen.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          those things are not equivalent.

          If by “those things” you mean a men’s club and a women’s club, that’s kind of my whole point. They should be considered the same but are not. Given men’s history of women’s oppression, there’s a lot we can’t do without the assumption of possibly being oppressive or sexist. Sometimes it’s hard being a man of one of the first generations in the starting centuries of women’s liberation (if it will even ever conclude).

          Not as hard as women have had it of course, but if we want equality for all, that means we have to act the part, from both sides. 🙂

      • atomicorange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        It’s entirely about self identification. There’s no gender policing, they just kindly ask people who start their comments with phrases like “as a man…” or “not a woman, but…” to refrain from further commenting. They don’t even delete the comments unless the guy keeps going. Even still, inevitably if the post reaches the front page all the women in the comments will be drowned out by highly upvoted “as a man…” commenters. They just want to have a conversation without being shouted over.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        exactly. this is the whole problem with trans stuff and gender essentailism.

        who the fuck is to say what a woman is? a lot of people tie to totally arbitrary nonsense.

        the concept of gender specific spaces is loaded with the notion that one sex/gender is worthy and the other in unworthy.

      • lolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah, you guys. We shouldn’t let women talk among themselves, they’re so irresponsible it ALWAYS leads to the EXACT SAME place. Let’s make sure we keep an eye on these females, just to make sure they’re not getting out of line. Pfft, “women only?” You’d think we’d learn by now! These women NEED a man to keep them track, we know what ALWAYS happens. Jesus christ.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          Are you suggesting that women are such dainty and delicate creatures, they can’t handle a man’s internet? They need protected from the smarter and meaner 14 year old boys from 4chan?

          Maybe the real solution is to just keep everything separate but equal? That famously works out well for everyone and never leads to any issues /s