awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cannedtuna@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · il y a 1 mois

I must con(FeS₂), this sparked a laugh

lemmy.world

message-square
103
link
fedilink
877

I must con(FeS₂), this sparked a laugh

lemmy.world

cannedtuna@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · il y a 1 mois
message-square
103
link
fedilink
  • Mr. Semi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    il y a 1 mois

    no science teacher would ever say that.

    Careful with those absolute statements there buddy. I was told the same by a teacher, who challenged the class to come up with natural examples of either straight lines or perfect circles. He talked about how such things cannot exist because at high enough resolution/magnification there will always be interruptions.

    Your own example of light traveling in straight lines doesn’t account for the fact that photons are waves and absolutely do not travel in straight lines.

    • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      il y a 1 mois

      they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though.

      space time is curved, not the light path.

      • SystemDisc@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        il y a 1 mois

        I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly

        • Maldreamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          il y a 1 mois

          But isn’t the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer?

          • SystemDisc@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            il y a 1 mois

            Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist.

            • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              il y a 1 mois

              “through vacuum”

        • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          il y a 1 mois

          gravity isn’t a force, it’s the curvature of space-time itself.

          light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn’t straight.

          like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it’s medium.

          Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity).

          • SystemDisc@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            il y a 1 mois

            Makes sense to me. Thanks

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        il y a 1 mois

        What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit?

        • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          il y a 1 mois

          Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through.

          it has choice anxiety.

          • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            il y a 1 mois

            Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn’t giving light a choice.

            • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              il y a 1 mois

              that’s worse :(

              let light be free

    • nehal3m@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      il y a 1 mois

      Only a Sith!

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      il y a 1 mois

      It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it’s a straight line.

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        il y a 1 mois

        Astonished

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        il y a 1 mois

        Uh…

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          il y a 1 mois

          Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves?

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            il y a 1 mois

            Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular)

            • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              il y a 1 mois

              Neat!

      • imgcat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        il y a 1 mois

        that’s just silly

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          il y a 1 mois

          Is it inaccurate?

          • imgcat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            il y a 6 jours

            plain wrong

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            il y a 1 mois

            Apparently it is

    • Klear@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      il y a 1 mois

      In that case that Pyrite proves nothing.

    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      il y a 1 mois

      But photons are also particles.

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      il y a 1 mois

      Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that’s because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein’s theories).

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 694 users / day
  • 1.75K users / week
  • 5.6K users / month
  • 17.7K users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 21K subscribers
  • 1.72K Posts
  • 39K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
  • LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org