Handle all the super sensitive health data of the entire country I suppose. Why? Anything wrong with the most evil techno-fascist data company from a foreign country handling that data?
Lesen Sie auch unsere Aufdecker-Reportage: “Wasser ist nass, zumindest im flüssigen Aggregatzustand.”
Turns out moving magnetic fields against each other is damn efficient and hard to beat.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I am still shocked that they started to ship first phones to media outlets and what they sent looks like half decent at least 150-200 USD phone, properly functionally Android stuff. I’d be even more shocked if eventually regular people would get something for their money. How much was it? 400-500 USD?
And if they actually did glue the tacky cover on in the US, the “assembled in the US” label might not even be fraudulent.
What’s next? Trump putting voluntarily a limit of 1 bn USD on the money he will rob from the US tax payer with no oversight?
I am late to the party. What’s wrong with boiling water? That said, my favourite power plants don’t do it: photovoltaic, wind power and hydropower (though wet).
Glances in Linux does both. There is an average total usage but there is also process usage and for the latter, 100% means one core fully utilised. 600% means 6 cores fully utilised for that process.
Nice whataboutism. So you are fine with the US hosting criminal and corrupt politicians that are wanted in their home countries? Polanski is really a low point but try getting a US citizen extradited from the US, for literally anything, before throwing stones. It is still less hard to get someone extradited from many European countries.
The thing is also not just extradition of a non-US citizen from the US (I guess if not a friend of the US regime they would call him a criminal immigrant) but that it appears if the US regime was actively helping that wanted corrupt politician to flee to the US.
That’s why France is serious about removing Microsoft and other US companies from any public systems. The entire EU should follow. I find it nice that Microsoft is also helping with ads, like here for Netherlands.
Poland has still a Fascist as President but he suffers because he isn’t in a presidential democracy and the government doesn’t share his hate for rule of law. Still he has enough power to keep Poland a bit in a bind and prevent undoing the anti-rule of law “reforms” of his party.
BMW ist auch sehr innovativ im E-Motorsegment. Auch VW mcht einiges richtig, wenn man sich den neuen ID.Polo ansieht. Das Problem ist dass die meisten Resourcen und Geld auf massives Lobbying betreiben für eine Antriebstechnologie ohne Zukunft, von kleinen Sparten abgesehen. Das Geld fehlt dann das Unternehmen zukunftsfit zu machen und den Anschluss nicht zu cerlieren.
Also die das komplette einbrechen von Verbrennern als Schwachpunkt zu bezeichnen zeigt schon dass manche mental noch in der Steinzeit sind. Das einknicken der Gesamtnachfrage nach Autos ist halt wahrscheinlich auch eine Folge von Inflation durch den Irankrieg und die KI Blase.
You mean because of “Clicks” because there are real BlackBerry clones on the market that you can actually buy?
If startpage is not listed as option anymore one can simply go to the site and by right clicking on the address it should be possible to add it as search engine option.
Removed by mod
Neat corpo-fascism you have there.
No I am challenging your basic premise. If you want to get some epically huge guarantees that all former Warsaw Pact countries will be denied the sovereign decision to join NATO for eternity. You’d demand at the very least to have that recorded in summit press notes but rather in some treaty, the way you made it look like innitially, it was done but it wasn’t - not at all.
The assurances further never were guarantees for the distant future. They were assurances during negotiations for and in the context of sudden German unification. Context matters and wording does too. Unless you are of course claiming that Russian leaders and diplomats are stupid and clueless.
If Russia considered those odd verbal assurances made in completely different circumstances that was missing from each and every agreement Russia has made with anyone, one would have expected that they had made some major fuss about the NATO expansion when it actually happened. They didn’t.
It just feels very forced of an argument something that was not only never repeated, also not in treaties after 1990, where that could have been done. But the second the Russian regime loses control over Ukraine, not because of what NATO has done but because it lost power in Ukraine to the people of Ukraine.
The simple question if those mentioned verbal assurances during a few negotiations in 1990, were of any significance in 2014 when Russia decided to break a number of binding treaties and invade a neighbour country it was contractually obliged to protect, is the following. Would Russia have acted in any way differently in 2014 if those verbal assurances in 1990 had never occured? I dare to say no, not at all. Russia would have done the very same thing under Putin because it was never about NATO or assurances, it was about losing control of Ukraine to the Ukrainian people and Putin could not accept that. If it makes no difference it is also of no significance.
I can’t help but wonder, was that page LLM generated?
Das ist sogar noch bestialischer. Wenn die Meldungen korrekt sind haben Zivilisten von irgendwelchen unbeteiligten Ländern viel Geld an Kriegsparteien bezahlt um dort für sie Kriegsverbrechen begehen zu können. Kaum packbar.