Really depends on the content. Real life, recorded for TV, where there’s not a ton of in focus detail? Yea it doesn’t matter much. Documentary, videogame, or other content where they try to keep everything in focus? It can make a huge difference.
Though I tend to watch things on a high quality computer monitor, not a tv across the room, so details stand out a lot more in the first place.
It doesn’t take an expert to think, “if they have to reload more often and cannot have easy access to tweaks like bumpstocks, they won’t be able to shoot as much lead.”
This isn’t rocket science.
The edit was to cover an additional point I noticed. Why are you reading so much into it? You’re being downvoted because you’ve put an attempt at a political meme into a science sub, expecting a science community to agree with politically charged topics.
Now you’re jumping to conclusions about why, because surely most people don’t disagree with you!
Just chill out dude. You’ll have a much better time here and IRL.
lol I’m not wrong.
Well in that case, the image is based on the false dichotomy that doesn’t exist of the parties’ policies. Most dems don’t want to remove all guns. They just want to keep guns out of crazies’ hands and some want to limit availability of particular things so any subsequent mass shooter has a harder time just endlessly popping off shots like the Vegas shooter… They do not fail to understand guns.
Ontop of that, vaccines are a very strange thing to put in opposition to guns. I know what you’re trying for, but it is again based in ignorance. Vaccines are a universal good. There is a reason, a good reason, vaccines are required in order to go to schools. Whether the pharma industry works off of capitalistic practices is a wholly separate thing. Just because big pharma is a piece of shit capitalist enterprise should not reflect poorly on vaccines themselves.
The pills need to be opposed decisions. Not the same thing with a different industry.
Yea. There have been a few spiritual successors that are pretty good, but none match the raw… villainy? No crazy, hyperstylized parody of itself, just pure calm confidence from the narrator while you play the bad guys in an otherwise normal fantasy setting? It’s always great when a game just goes for it, and DK nailed it.
Capitalists are only interested in quarterly profits, not this “long term sustainability” BS. Just look at oil companies and global warming. They’d rather literally destroy the planet with the status quo than innovate a long term solution.
Political, or tribal? Political is supposed to mean compromising on solutions to tough and intertwined problems. Not throwing on a jerzy and rooting for your dumbass team regardless of what they do or say…
Their tribalism is a violation of my purity test. Dumbasses don’t get to redefine what words mean, even if they’re dumb enough to vote for a braindead celebrity.
They always butchered games. What you’re remembering are the games made by studios that EA purchased, made before they were gutted for IP.
Nono, you totally just didn’t recycle enough aluminum and glass. Anthropogenic climate change is definitely your fault!
No they want to capitalize on pedos finding victims.
One pays MS per click.
Only some know. You ironically give them too much credit for having brains…
For most office workers, it’s both working in an office and living paycheck to paycheck.
All executives are guillotine class shitlords.
Well you see we signed a defense pact with Israel so we can’t not support genocide and - oh wait we’ve lost another election…
In addition to what others have already said, it’d be really silly to make one a negative of the other in the most basic sense, too.
There have been so many issues with electrons having a “negative” charge, and that’s a binary situation! It would be so much worse to introduce implied favoritism with basic directions.