As the Board Bored of Peace

There’s only one way to read it.

Houthi or Ansar Allah?

Funny, but that last one counts for Gaelic, not French.

Are they expecting to fight in Ukraine or in Greenland?
Do the soldiers get a choice where they want to be stationed at?

NO! THEY are the space nazis!
Space nazis of the US empire.
Just like Starship troopers are space nazis of the US empire to it’s filmmaker.

Now excuse me while I cut off your hand.

With capitalism, Rich criminals express their regret on television when they get carried away with their power.
With socialism, Rich criminals express their regret on television to those with power and get carried away.

I’m working on a conlang.
Thanks for that tip.

I’ve only seen bits a and pieces of it and so this is what I know of:

1990s show with 1950s aesthetics and pacing.
The mystery message explained after 200+ episodes of 20+ minutes:
“TV is bad y’all, go read a book”

They don’t want you to know

Genetics
Don’t even need to hit a pillow

I only know video hosters, so

#1 Nathan Rich
#2 J.T. Chapman
#3 Ben Norton

Not really scholars, but they have interesting insights.

First time I’m going to criticize the CPC here.
Also, Allyson Horn, you’re on my list for using “crack” in relation to “China”,
which instead you could perhaps use for, you know, ICE maybe,
or Western ‘regimes’ versus pro-Palestinian protesters, except for Israel,
where ‘kidnapping and torture’ could be used in place of capture.

That said, I’ll go even a step further than @obvs,
who correctly points out that this is like building spikes on park benches,
so the homeless have nowhere to sleep.

If the CPC wants to “reverse the falling the birth rate”, it should think of a couple of things:

1. Why would you even want that?
   We’re in the 21st century and curing age related diseases to the point of rejuvenation could be just around the corner.
   I would in fact argue that the world is less than 10 years away from it and since China is rapidly advancing with pharmaceuticals, there’s no need for me to say the West instead of the world.
2. Increase income security. Especially at young ages.
   No one is going to want children if they’re not secure in their finances
   and if it takes 40+ years to be secure in one’s finances,
   then you’re gonna have to hope solution #1 to come true.
3. The most controversial one. Increase the operational sex ratio of female:male to slightly above 1, which is where I think the demand/supply equilibrium sits. Right now in China it’s 117 males per 100 females at age 20.
   How are these 17 extra men going to find a partner? And why does this article mention a 17 year old girl when I’m quite confident that it’s 17 young men per 117 men who have a for more likely issue to not find a suitable relationship,
   because it’s going to be impossible for 17 out of 117 for them.
   No amount of social skills will help 117 20-something year old men magically turn their chances having a relationship with a potential 100 20-something year old women into an equivalent potential of 117 20-something year old women, but still remain with 100 20-something year old women for 117 20-something year old men.
   If the numbers don’t add up, then it’s going to be physically impossible to solve this issue.
   This should be textbook dialectical materialism 101.

Mandatory social skill lessons then comes in 4th.
And the these teachings should give students
a complete overview of society,
give a complete list
of all forms of communication options available
and all their possible consequences depending on
character, something I call “time slots of desire”
(offering someone a bowl of spaghetti that just ate spaghetti and feels full),
and mood (offering someone a bowl of spaghetti when that person is balancing a heavy object),
instead of list of random list of author advisories
(Sarah was afraid to talk to John, then she said this to him, and it all went well.)
plus a dose of optimism (Communicating is fun! Do it often! You’ll have a blast!),
which I got.

What double standards?

When someone uses a rifle to kill people who were on their way to the voting booth for independence and reattachment and in retaliation you bring in a tank, you’re doing self-defense.
When someone throws a rock at you because they’re being oppressed by you as you’re occupying their land and you bring in a tank, you’re doing terrorism.

Nothing wrong with this picture.
Other than the other side needs text also.

Goaded (by the US) ↔ Self-defense
Resistance (against oppression) ↔ (State) Terrorism

As long as the Epstein class remains in power in corrupt Usonia,
I will believe that these men are charged with false allegations if jailed, but guilty if they go free.

A lot, because there’s too many vassal countries propping up the US economy.
They will be going down first, like East Germany before the USSR.

That suggests that Maga Usonia’s history will be like that of Nazi Germany, which offends me.
…
Maga Usonia is far worse.

It’s national brotherhood week

I don’t think a new deal will be enough this time around.

What about racist conspiracy theories?
…
No wait, I was thinking of fascist somehow.

Uhmm… What about telling others to pull themselves up by their bootstraps
after pulling up the ladder behind oneself?

That comment makes me question your other experiences.