
This is a great precedent to set.

This is a great precedent to set.


Thanks for posting in shower thoughts.
Rule 2 is that the entire thought must be in the title. Do you think you could edit your post?
Ideally shower thoughts are applicable to lots of people. See the side bar for examples. I guess the idea that the prior year has been bruising, but we made it through, could be generally applicable.

The article seems to capture that to some degree:
This is not a human universal. Continental Civil Law systems (France, Germany) criminalize failure to rescue—you can face imprisonment for not helping when you could do so without risk. Islamic law’s Fard Kifaya creates communal duty: if no one rescues the drowning, the entire community is considered sinful. These traditions recognize that the bystander is not merely an observer but a citizen with affirmative duties.
Interesting article. I would be interested in the counter arguments.


In the study the longest they waited after tattooing the mouse before giving the vaccine was 2 months.
They made some connections with people that had tattoos for a much longer time. But I can’t tell how meaningful those connections are.
This is well outside of my field.
Edit:
Also, it sounds like the tattooed mice were less responsive to the covid vaccine but more responsive to the Influenza vaccine.


Wow these all sound so much better than Proton’s photo backup. In the words of @mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud , it’s pants.

Carbon capture is good to develop but Its no excuse to burn more fossil fuels. The tech is just not very good. A bunch of it was just proven to be fraudulent.
Cutting emissions and moving to solar and wind is viable. This policy is not based in reality.
c/dataisbeautiful :P
I had no idea the share was so large.


is your roomba loosing its parts? looks like a roomba brush
That’s a creative way to do it

The newest data is from 2014?


I think pigs and bears are pretty closely related.


Liberapay is really nice. I like the payment options they have to minimize the fees, like making 2 years of small “monthly” payments in a single charge to your bank card.


Rule 2 is a little gray but if the title reads like a catchy headline, then it’s probably not a complete thought. Another way to think about it, the title should make you want to read more because it’s a good thought, not because it a cliff hanger.
OP, would you mind updating the title with a little more context?
For example if you added “because they are providing training data” to the title. It would seem more like a complete thought to me.


Poland ball makes videos?! I always thought they were just images.


I try to be objective where I can but all of the rules have gray area so I try to err on the side of not taking things down. Little nudges from the community, like your comment here, help to shape the community so thanks for being an engaged member!


I see there are many variations of this joke.

Pretty cool. Yeah a little short on buttons.
As a mod, I thank you sincerely for your judgement.

Good read.
It’s a bummer to see AI gobbling up entire books and often misrepresenting them but then IA can’t provide the source material.
^ This was reported for being a troll. I think the reporter is correct. Even the original post is a bit of a troll for the average Lemmy person.
If you choose to reply to this comment, careful not to feed the trolls.