• pepperprepper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unfortunately I think this also has to do with the changing tech around war. Drones are the new hotness and it is a very good counter to tanks warfare.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      Drones don’t hold ground, soldiers do. Soldiers that have tanks are going to be more effective than those without them.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          11 months ago

          Have you seen a photo of what tanks in combat look like these days? They have cages welded on top of them. Also the hatches can be closed. A lot of tankers like to have the hatch open so the commander can have have more visibility, but it’s not a necessity.

          There have been ways to take out a tank with missiles for a long time now. The reason why they’re still used is that air defenses exist and nothing beats the cost efficiency of moving a big gun close to the enemy and firing a lot of cheap ammunition at them.

          Also are you going to tell civilians they can move back into their towns based solely on drones? If the civilians are behind a bunch of tanks, they’re safe because the drones will go after the tanks before going after the civilians. You need soldiers to hold ground. A soldier in a tank is going to be harder for a drone to kill than a soldier that’s not in a tank.

          Yes drones are effective, but drones can’t hold ground and keep civilians safe.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah dead soldiers inside of tank that got 1 shot by a micro drone with a grenade the moment they opened their hatch don’t hold ground either.

        Also, if you’ve seen them in Gaza they are next to useless in rubble that heavy with dudes popping out of tunnels that disable them without ever being seen.

        Historically even, tanks are awful against gorilla fighters. Which is what a lot Ukraine combat has become. Them not using tanks is not surprising.

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think you hit the nail on the head. Even without drones, they are awful I’m so much of modern warfare. If you’ve watched any footage out of Gaza you’ll see a dude pop up out of tunnel and just completely disable a tank without them ever seeing him. Tanks are quickly going the way of the cannon. In much the same way.

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s always been true of city warfare though. Tanks are not designed for that.

      • silverlose@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Very true. I think the tank, much like the cannon, will still have its own niche use case but isn’t the silver bullet so many armies saw it as. Happens a lot I think

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyzBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          It never was a silver bullet. They have always been best in open terrain and worst in terrain that allows infantry to hide everywhere.