• @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    791 year ago

    Too fucking bad.

    Give them the boat and QA your fucking code next time.

    Large corporations are happy to sell contacts like this to the lowest bidder - the reason those contractors are so cheap is because they occasionally make big fucking mistakes.

    Pay for quality or pay the price when your cheap ass gets fucked.

    • @lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here’s just an apropos of that, but one of the earlier companies I worked at in Canada was a Software Consultancy, like over 15 years ago.

      Companies would and did reach out for things like a competition to enter and we’d have to code it up. The typical way it “used” to work was the big shots get a lot of money and they get a bunch of fresh out of UofT or UW grads to work hard to get it done.

      Well, guess what, they screwed the pooch on this competition. For some reason, they rejected or didn’t collect ANY of the email submissions that were valid. So they couldn’t even pick a valid email to declare the winner. The company was furious and said, this isn’t our problem and we’re not going to manufacture a winner. So what my/that company did was it did log errors for invalid emails. They basically chose a winner from people that wrote invalid email addresses. I can’t remember but it was something like person@example.co.m. Why did they not do client-side and just relied on server-side? I don’t know. I wasn’t directly on the project. Anyways, they gave the prize to someone that did a typo.

  • @Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    Uh uh no way. You either insure against fuckup payouts or you eat it.

    2026: [Business] says ‘technical errors’ falsely told all participants that they lost in [marketing promo], no prizes handed out again this year.

  • athos77
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    Second year in a row they did this. Last year they told a bunch of people they’d won ten grand.

    • Pyr
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I don’t recall any of these errors happening when you just had to actually roll of the rim of your cup.

      But they decided to go digital so they can steal customer data and force people to create unnecessary accounts and download their app.

  • @someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    email on Wednesday morning from Tim Hortons that recapped all the prizes he won this year and it included one he didn’t recognize: a 2024 Tracker Targa 18 WT boat and trailer, which retails for $39,995 US (about $55,000 Cdn) — the only one available to participants.

    A recap email. This is going to be fun in court.

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    I think I listened to a podcast about a kid who won some huge shit this way in the 90s. From Pepsi. Courts ruled against them. I wanna say fighter jet. I might be wrong.

    These people should get paid. They didn’t make the mistake.

    • It was a fighter jet, but the crux of thing was that while they advertised “hey get enough tickets, and you can get something on our ticket store, mike this military jet for xxx tickets”, the military jet was not in the store (obviously). The guy accumulated enough tickets to afford the price that was in the ad, then sued to hold Pepsi accountable for their advertisements.

      IIRC he lost, because the judge went “yeah you can clearly see it’s meant as an exaggeration bye”