• @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      437 days ago

      We can have regulatory institutions while still democratizing the economy. We don’t need capitalist-neo-feudalism to work together to protect public health, improve our educational and build infrastructure.

        • @finderscult@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          257 days ago

          Anarchy isn’t the complete lack of all organization and cooperation, especially anarchosyndicalism.

          • @stinky@redlemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 days ago

            I’m sure you’d agree that anarco syndicalism is a strategy unfamiliar to most people around the world. I’m sure you read the news often enough to know that people don’t know how their own system works, let alone one as exotic as anarcocynicalism.

            So instead of crossing your arms and demanding to know why somebody doesn’t know this, you could instead educate them. Provide a link. Give an explanation. Help that person bridge the gap between what they know (for example, I used the word anarchy in my response, so you can safely assume that I’m familiar with that term) and what you know.

            This helps people move towards your goal, because now they have tools to begin doing the work.

            Or you can stand there, cross because people don’t understand, and you’ve done nothing to educate them, with no forward motion and just a series of complaints. It’s up to you. I wish you the best of luck making your choice.

          • @stinky@redlemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            What’s my preconception? If you’re saying it’s false, you need to be able to say what it is. Otherwise your response is without value.

            • @voldage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              76 days ago

              You did imply nonexistence of regulatory institutions - and, to dig a bit deeper into that, anything that would sufficiently fulfill their role - in your first comment and contextualized that to anarcho syndicalism in your second, which reveals that your intent was to argue against anarcho syndicalism on the basis of it necessarily being devoid of some sort regulatory body or it’s equivalent. Even without being an anarcho syndicalist I know that to be a bogus argument, and so should you, unless you don’t know or understand it’s propositions.

              I’d compare that to a medieval farmhand claiming that the country can not survive without a king, while surviving (barely, sure, but that’s not the point) without any of the institutions you’ve mentioned and disproving your claim completely.

              Just a jab at the argument, not at you, please don’t take it too seriously. Radical changes are scary and because of that they seem impossible to attempt and absurd to discuss, but you need to remember we only have that democracy thing for a few hundred years now, and the shift to it was very radical. Sometimes it’s good to consider alternatives to systems that yeld subpar results with very weak promises of stability that are betrayed every 7 years, because you just might find the new neat thing like democracy, or at very least broaden your perspective.

              • @stinky@redlemmy.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                I’m free to take this seriously because it’s a serious topic. Don’t try to cover your butt by saying, “I was just kidding,” or “don’t take this seriously.” If you mean what you say, be accountable and stand up for it.

                You’re jabbing me, you say so yourself. I’m not interested in trading more barbs so I’m disengaging. Good luck with effecting change.

            • @Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              116 days ago

              What’s anarchy? If you’re saying you’re against it, you need to be able to say what it is. Otherwise your response is without value.

              • @stinky@redlemmy.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                You, and, and anyone can freely discuss the definition of anarchy because it’s publicly available.

                My preconception is not. That’s why you’re wrong.

                Have the day you deserve.

  • Cruxifux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    417 days ago

    Literally none of those things are coming back, where does the person who made this live?

    Like the only thing coming back from the 20’s is the rise of fascism and the Great Depression.

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Charleston never went anywhere. You’ll still see the step all over in other dances from breakdancing to pop singers. It’s a foundational dance step like the t step. Which makes sense since it goes with many things. https://youtu.be/90TzDXjWTdo