• r00ty
      link
      fedilink
      1084 months ago

      I mean, you say that. But I think there’s money to be made here. If we just create a new name for pasteurisation processes and market it as “that thing” raw milk. Of course with a 200% markup. Free money!

        • Scratch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 months ago

          Milk cooked low and slow until it falls off the bone.

      • @m_f@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        194 months ago

        Like that bit in Parks & Rec where people are scared of flouride in the drinking water, so they rebrand it as H₂Flow and everyone loves it.

        There’s truth to that quote of “A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it”

  • @Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    120
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “Tech bros reinvent trains, but worse” makes perfect sense if your end goal is to grift people.

    Everyone knows what a train is, and any investment firm will be able to understand the material, land, and labor costs because all of that is well known and documented.

    When you have an idea that no one has ever done before, then the costs get nebulous. Getting funding turns into a marketing problem, and thats a lot easier when the person paying doesn’t know exactly what they’re getting. Every investor wants to be on the ground floor of the next major innovation, and your job is to convince them that’s what this is.

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    91
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Also, I really feel the need to point out: pasteurizing isn’t what makes the milk less tasty. Homogenization is what skims the fat and makes it into bland watery (and profitable) Supermarket milk.

    But ironically, boiling milk is FAR worse for all the vitamins than pasteurizing it. Boiled raw milk is less nutritious for you than Supermarket milk, especially since supermarket milk is often fortified back to its original levels or beyond. It IS tastier though, but pasteurized unhomogenized milk does exist, which is great because it tastes like a desert, AND won’t kill you.

    • Homogenization doesn’t skim the fat. It breaks the fat globules up into very small particles that form a stable emulsion that doesn’t separate. All they do is pass it through a high pressure nozzle.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        True, but generally they ALSO skim the fat right before/during. You don’t have to though

          • Tar_Alcaran
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            “whole milk” is often skimmed, or occasionally, added to to make it fit in a certain legally defined bandwidth of fat content. It’s not unmodified.

            Also, homogenization absolutely changes the texture of the milk. That is in fact part of the point, making sure nobody gets the crappy milk. Some people prefer it, some don’t, it’s a personal taste thing.

          • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Whole milk doesn’t mean “all of the milk fat”. I believe it’s something like 3.25%.

            Are you thinking of heavy cream?

              • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                34 months ago

                Right, and at least in the US, I believe “whole milk” is a very specific definition, so the fat content has to be altered to match that.

            • @boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              That percentage value is the total fat content of the milk, not relative to unmodified milk. No cow puts out pure fat.

              • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                Yes, but “whole milk” (at least in the US) has to fit a specific definition re: fat contents. So they do have to skim it.

                • @boonhet@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Okay, sure, they skim it. But your original comment was worded a bit badly, the way I read it implied that whole milk contains 3.25% of all the fat that it should if it was truly whole, rather than that it contains 3.25% whereas true whole milk is just slightly more. Some people do believe that whole milk is actually 100% fat which is why I thought it best to correct you.

                  I do wonder why they have such a precise requirement for whole milk in the US. Where I live, most whole milk sold is roughly 3.5 to 3.8 percent, and often they actually give a range instead of an exact value on the package. I could buy a carton of milk that says “3.8% to 4.4%” if I wanted to. My personal preference is “whatever’s cheaper, but if whole milk isn’t much more expensive, go for whole”. Usually I use it in food rather than drinking it straight so the flavor doesn’t matter as much to me.

    • The term that people should look out for is “creamline” or “cream-top” milk. It’s whole milk that is unhomogenized. It basically separates in the bottle, so there’s a layer of cream floating on top of skim.

      I couldn’t say for sure, but I’ve heard it’s better for making cheese/yogurt/etc.

      Personally, I wouldn’t buy it just for drinking cause I don’t think it lasts as long.

  • kubica
    link
    fedilink
    844 months ago

    I don’t even know how to feel about this… I’m so tired of people’s bullshit in very broad ways.

    • @krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      614 months ago

      This is what happens when you treat every idea as equally worthy of consideration. We decided it was too mean spirited to call stupid ideas what they are and now the idiots think they know as much as the experts.

    • Fuck spez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 months ago

      “I’m so tired of people’s bullshit in very broad ways” IS how I feel about this and many other things.

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      I kinda feel like we failed here

      Well I guess not us, but greedy people. It’s hard to imagine a more well-educated populace being this dumb. And it’s hard to imagine us not being better educated in a world with less greed.

  • @niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    704 months ago

    Rediscovering well-established shit from first principles and a science-illiterate, history-ignorant stance.
    I’m betting the raw milk thing re-entered society via the crystals and essential oils crowd?

    The same type of people that said back in the 70s - or maybe even before - that television screens emitted cancer-causing radiation.
    In the 90s they were saying that about the magnetic fields in digital alarm clock radios, too. Completely oblivious to the night lamps by the bed, those also conduct electricity. But noooo… it was the tiny LED screen that suddenly made the difference… I guess?
    Also completely oblivious to the Earth’s titanic magnetic field dwarfing and drowning whatever they had with their little gizmos in their normal-sized bedrooms in the 90s.

    • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Rediscovering well-established shit from first principles and a science-illiterate, history-ignorant stance

      This is basically the entire process Libertarians go through before realizing they’re idiots… They have to re-learn all of the things we’ve already collectively learned as a society, generations ago. But I guess they just can’t believe that we need taxes to fund roads and water infrastructure, until they experience it first hand.

      Not even just Libertarians, just conservatives in general these days. Look at Elon Musk and how quick he re-learned why Twitter would “censor” shit.

      It’s like these people think everything we do is just empty tradition, and until they experience it first hand, they will never believe we need a regulation. When the reality is that many of our regulations are written in blood, and it’s idiotic and indefensible to want to go back to those times and do it all again. Simply because the richest dude in the world can’t be bothered to read a goddamn book.

      • @Malfeasant@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What you’re talking about boils down to who to trust. Unfortunately, governments are notorious for abusing such trust. I can’t fault anyone who questions the way things are, and why- assuming of course that they are receptive to answers other than “it’s a government conspiracy to control us.” Not that that’s never true, but it’s certainly not always true.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Unfortunately, governments are notorious for abusing such trust.

          Source? Because that assumes that this is the normality. Which is interesting as a statement, although of course it massively depends on your local government, but not everyone lives in Syria or so.

          This always gets carted out, and yet then people always have to point at the same dozen or so big things in hundreds of years of gov history, and never mention the possibly billions of non-abused trust moments in the same space of time.

          • @JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            I think healthy skepticism when it comes to the government is good. Especially if people want transparency. Holding them accountable for abuses is even better, but has been less than ideal in practice over the years.

            Unfortunately, people tend to skip healthy skepticism and dive right into conspiracy driven paranoid delusions, and lack of government accountability does feed into that mindset. Combine that with Maga propaganda, fox News, and other extremist media and we’ve got a shit show.

          • @Twoisformyshow@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Source?

            Edward Snowden immediately springs to mind… You can add in most of the law enforcement agencies in every country with the presence of the internet and cell phones. How many eyes are we up to now?

            • Carighan Maconar
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              That’s not what the question was about? I mean sure, if you stop after that exact word and immediately hit “reply”.

            • Carighan Maconar
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              I love how nobody reads beyond that word and completely misunderstands the comment. Such a beautiful example of how America got so 110% politics-illiterate.

          • @stringere@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            USA checking in with a very short, nowhere near comprehensive, list of the more egregious breaches in trust by the federal government; local and state governments undoubtedly have more to add: Business Plot left uninvestigated Kennedy Assassination and the Warren Commission War on Drugs Bush v Gore decided by Supreme Court for Bush despite losing popular vote which led into… 9/11 and Weapons of Mass Destruction - wars in Iraq and Afghanistan justified by lies

            • Carighan Maconar
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              As I said in the other comment, your reply also exemplifies how people can’t even hold an attention span for more than a single word any more, and as a result completely misunderstand something. I’m sorry, but you exactly showcase how modern political weaponization of internet reactionism works.

                • Carighan Maconar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Or they’re all americans! Ha! Need to create tiktok videos to hold their attention for the 2.3 seconds I’d have.

        • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          It’s not just governments that these people distrust, it’s anything they don’t understand. That includes science. Science does not have a political agenda.

          • @Malfeasant@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            Science does not, but science gets funding from people with political agendas, so it’s not immune.

    • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      214 months ago

      IME you are pegging entirely the wrong group of people.

      For at least 10 years the only people I’ve heard making a stink about being able to get raw milk are the same folks complaining about fluoride in drinking water.

      That’s not so much the crystals and oils crowd as it is the fuck your feelings crowd.

      • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I have a family member that converted to some weird Christian Judaism (don’t ask me), has always been super into oils, and more recently became an anti-Vax and raw milk person. So that scene is more diverse… haven’t spoken to her since she went cray, but I would bet most of my money that she is MAGA too now.

    • @Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      If you’re betting on that crowd, you’re just choosing to overlook the fluoride in the water, gay chem trails, 5G tower and microchips in the COVID vaccine crowd. There is some overlap with the crystal people sure, but much more Alex Jones/QAnon, full on violent basement demon crowd.

    • @smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The earth’s magnetic field is much weaker than a simple coil in a transformer, as can be easily demonstrated by holding a compass near said device and watching the needle align with that instead of the earth.

      • @Holzbesteck@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        The earths magnetic field influences the needle when I am standing 400+ km away from magnetic north. To have the coil of a transformer influence my needIe, I have to be relatively close to it. So I feel like your statement is incorrect.

        I’ll happily be corrected if I overlooked or misunderstood something.

        • @smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          The field isn’t located at the north or south pole - you’re not 400km away from it, you’re immersed inside the field, and your compass is showing the local alignment of that field.

          Just about anything with an EM field of its own will be stronger than that.

  • @KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    614 months ago

    Sometimes I’m appalled by humanity forgetting how to make cool stuff that they could do in antiquity and then had to re-discover it, like roman glass, concrete, etc. And then I come across stuff like this and it all makes perfect sense.

    • @Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      354 months ago

      I’ve always been intrigued how scurvy has been “cured” several times but only really got figured out in the 20’s after Shackleton’s expedition. And then even still, scurvy is back in the news with people being too poor to afford food.

    • Much of Roman technology was lost because the collapse of state capacity and according administrative capacity rendered the balance of agrarian to non-agrarian workers unsustainable.

      A high equilibrium, where the products of population centers supports and enhances the productivity of the agrarian surroundings while administrative pressure (like taxes) encourage the trade between the two: If the farmers need to pay taxes in coin, they need to sell surplus to merchants who ship it to cities to sell it. Conversely, the craftsmen producing iron plows, pottery and so on need coin too, so they sell tools, which the farmers buy to improve their yield. The state also buys services (like construction) and the elite buys luxuries, further creating jobs and fostering more technological development.

      (Obviously, the elite skim a lot off the value produced by others - just because they did some good for others with it doesn’t mean they didn’t primarily do a lot of good for themselves.)

      But when internal strife, plague, worsening climate, desperate invaders and identity politics all start breaking that machine, it’s hard to keep it from falling apart. And once the rural argarian production can no longer sustain the cities, the skills and crafts of the urbanites get lost.

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    264 months ago

    So who is going to put out the fires, libertarian?

    Well, everyone will just regularly pay a little to the person that has a fire truck and they’ll put out the fires when needed.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      English
      234 months ago

      I can’t wait for the future where we’re paying subscription fees for a thousand separate essential services and the libertarians start suggestinf thet there should just be a service that provides a single source for paying and managing all of tjose subscriptions.

      • @Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Honestly, we’re at a point technologically where we should be able to digitally vote for what, at least a portion of, our tax dollars pay for.

        It’s not a bad idea, but we don’t need to deregulate everything first to do that.

  • @bunchberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    204 months ago

    Boiling things isn’t guaranteed to make it safe, because sometimes bacteria produce toxins as a byproduct that are heat-stable, so if you kill the bacterial you can still get food poisoning if you drink it.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      174 months ago

      Couldn’t one invent a way more effective if more complicated heat-treatment cycle and a corresponding plant for performing it, and then ideally standardization to ensure this is always done this way before milk is sold for consumption?

      Some influencer should get onto that!

      • @MrConfusion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The goal of pasteurization is to kill of harmful pathogens. If you do this early and package and store the milk in the right conditions it can be stable and safe for a long time.

        If you don’t pasteurize the milk and leave it for a long time, pathogens in the milk, such as bacteria, can potentially produce toxins. Boiling it at that point might not help, no, as it kills the bacteria, but can leave behind the toxins.

        So pasteurization is very effective if done early, but you can’t do whatever you want to the milk and then pasteurize it right before using it and everything is good.

      • @bunchberry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        No, the point is that bacteria can produce toxins in between a company packaging a product and a person receiving it and then boiling it themselves. Companies have to kill the bacteria prior to shipping it. It’s similar to canned foods for example, they put it in the can then heat up the can to kill the bacteria, then ship it, so it shouldn’t have any harmful bacteria in there to begin with.

    • @Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      234 months ago

      As someone that grew up on a farm.

      Yeah, “raw” cow milk isn’t to be consumed. You’d be shitting your guts out for hours.

      • @beerclue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        124 months ago

        I read somewhere that certain places have a very large amount of people with lactose intolerance, like north America. I used to drink raw milk, straight from the bucket my grandma used to milk the cow. Never had any issues. Grew up on a farm in Romania in the 80s.

        • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          74 months ago

          Not just lactose, raw milk can contain all sorts of nasty stuff. Seems like you probably had super healthy cows, a good immune system, and a healthy dose of luck.

        • @Paddzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          There’s more to it than just lactose, they have very high fat. You’d want to at least filter it through a cloth.

      • @HostilePasta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        Grew up working on a dairy farm, definitely drank raw milk and didn’t shit my guts out. It would if you drank, like, a LOT of it. But seriously you’d have to drink more than a cup or so.

  • @TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    rediscovering science is one of my favorite things about the human mind. The brain is hardwired to fuck with shit and figure stuff out, often at its own harm.
    It’s so nice seeing people taking stuff apart to learn how it works, it’s how we learn!

    My grandpa immediately after getting married went home and disassembled and reassembled my grandma’s hairdryer for fun, as expected she wasn’t very happy about it. This kind of mentality is what led him to becoming a high up worker in a paper bag factory then later a grocery store manager.

    (obligatory DONT mess with CRTs and Microwaves, they can kill you)

    I started my computer science obsession by going against my dad’s command* and plugging in a different mouse that wasn’t as old as the one that was used on the family i3 dell optiplex computer.
    I went against his suggestion and used Firefox instead of chrome. These learning opportunities often backfired, I’ve nuked my OS (both windows and Linux) like 5 times by this point and had to reinstall, but I wouldn’t have it any other way. I want to get some sort of a junk 2nd car that I can tinker with without messing up my own car that I need.

    *note about my dad

    my dad is very much a 9-5 “it just works” kinda guy, he would always call over a friend when the PC stopped working and would just take his car to a mechanic. He doesn’t know how to teach me about computers or how to fix it if I break something past unplugging everything and plugging it back in. He encouraged me to experiment in other ways, just not with computers.

    I think exploration and mistakes are adorable and should be encouraged.

  • @0b0b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    Can’t wait until they suggest heating it to a mild temperature (perhaps 140F) and keeping it there for a length of time, ensuring it is not exposed to the air.