• @Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    363 months ago

    Yep. Basically a religion. Like conservatism and capitalism. They can not fail. Only be failed.

    • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      283 months ago

      It really is absurd how the metaphorical party line hasn’t changed in the past 100 years. Everything is preordained, except for anytime our noble forces fail, in which case it’s an aberration and The Conspiracy Of The International Bourgeoisie

      • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        183 months ago

        Yep. Theories are a fine thing to have. But you have to test them. And if they fail every time they’re tested then you need new theories. And barring that. The fact that things have changed so much between the time the theories were crafted and now. Large portions certainly are not relevant as they used to be if ever at all.

  • @Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    203 months ago

    I dont know the context, the only word I realoze is AES as in encryption, which makes it kinda funny, but probably not correct.

    • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      293 months ago

      “AES” is ‘actually existing socialism’. To tankies, this means things like “The Soviet Union”, “The PRC”, “North Korea”, and “Venezuela”

              • FundMECFS
                link
                fedilink
                English
                53 months ago

                I’m nowhere near as well known to the tankies as PugJesus and still have recieved multiple “go die in Ukraine retard” type comments. Politeness really isn’t a tankie strength.

          • VindictiveJudge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 months ago

            “Claims to adore Marx, but seems to decry every single movement to put his ideas into practice”

            Didn’t Marx disown the Russian Revolution and other violent attempts at implementing communism? Y’know, the very factions these guys put on a pedestal?

            • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              113 months ago

              No, Marx didn’t live long enough to see the Russian Revolution, and Marx was certainly not adverse to violent revolution. Though he mused that some sufficiently democratic bourgeois societies might be capable of a peaceful transition to socialism, it was certainly not the focus of his writings. Funny enough, he did suggest that Russia was the least ready for socialism of all the major European nations.

              Marx, however, believed that development into a bourgeois capitalist society was a necessary prerequisite for a socialist dictatorship of the proletariat. The Bolsheviks were a radical departure from this line of thinking, proposing both that the peasantry were a revolutionary class and that a capitalist mode of production was not necessary to transition to a socialist workers’ state. In addition, the Bolsheviks, despite their claims, were quite anti-democratic, which goes strongly against the spirit and letter of Marx’s writings.

                • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  5
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  The Bolsheviks were quite well aware that socialism would be impossible in just Russia because it was pre-capitalist, and were banking on the success of the German Revolution to establish socialist supply chains. This is why with the failure of the revolutionary in Germany, the NEP was considered a tactical retreat.

                  A ‘tactical retreat’ here meaning ‘exactly what they overthrew the right-SRs and eliminated the Mensheviks for supporting’, except now, conveniently, all in the control of the Bolsheviks. Hell, half the reason that the NEP was implemented was because the peasantry were resisting collectivization, and the other half was that the ‘war communism’ of the civil war period had been fucking ruinous; not a well-considered ideological decision. Not only that, but the NEP was extremely short-lived, far too short to build up industry to the standards of a capitalist mode of production, and if it was up to Lenin, it would’ve been even shorter-lived.

                  Considering the Bolsheviks literally invented Democratic Centralism and made the USSR into a democracy, its definitely not fair to call them “anti-democratic”.

                  Democratic centralism is not democratic, and the USSR definitely was not fucking democratic in any real sense.

          • @rami@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 months ago

            I’d be interested in what you have to say against the black panther party, if you have the time.

            • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              The only thing I said against them was that they didn’t accomplish much in practical terms, which apparent translated to an undying hatred according to tankie morons who love to talk about me, lol.

            • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Nah. Here it’s topical. Elsewhere, it’s just attention-seeking. Who gives a shit about online drama between tankies and a non-tankie poster? People on a comm for online tankie drama, maybe, but not people in a normal meme sub.

              Its home is here.

              Besides, it’s like 7 months old at this point.