• @Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Germany has supported Israel with weapons whilst knowing they were committing a Genocide, so the answer for Germany is probably “Yes”, at least as an accomplice.

          The answer for the Republic Of Ireland is as far as I know “No”.

          • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 months ago

            Sounds to me like war crimes are still a pretty good way to determine who the good guys are, then.

    • lurch (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      I don’t think it’s officially a war. So it’s a regular crime and I think that’s also better, because the victim country can react more quickly and more powerful.

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 months ago

    Hang the captain and first mate, take the oil, sink the ship. This is how we’ve always dealt with pirates.

  • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The head of the investigation, Risto Lohi of the National Bureau of Investigation, told Reuters the vessel was threatening to cut a second power cable, Estlink1, and the BalticConnector gas pipe between Finland and Estonia at the time it was seized.

    “Lohi” is Finnish for “salmon”. That’s right. Inspector Salmon is in charge of this investigation. Thankyou, Finland.

  • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Steal some of the oil. Replace it at correct stoichiometric ratio with ammonium nitrate or some other powerful oxidiser. Attach a detonator and tracking device to the ship. Don’t tell the crew. Let the crew go free. When the ship reaches its destination, detonate. Halifax explosion, round two.

    Fuck you, whoever would buy Russian oil.

    • @Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 months ago

      You realize that a lot of Russian oil gets “laundered” and then imported to the EU? So you would likely blow up an EU port, which is like a double Christmas and birthday gift to Putin.

      • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        It would probably blow up the port doing the laundering, which is unlikely to be happening in the EU.

        But it would even more likely blow up an Indian or Chinese port.

        It doesn’t matter. Like I said, I think this is a really bad idea. Mainly because it is collective punishment, and almost all of the thousands of victims would have had nothing to do with their corporations’ and their governments’ decision to buy that oil.

        • @Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          They also pump oil from ship to ship while at sea. It is said that this ship in particular also was involved in such maneuvers, which of course are highly dangerous and can easily result in oil spilled.

        • @HoMaster@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Last year I read that Italian oil refineries were refining Russian oil. Anything for a profit for some businesses.

    • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I should maybe add that I don’t think this is actually a good idea. I can just see that it’s scientifically possible, and I enjoy constructing scenarios like this.

      But to those who are riding Putin’s dick, just know that these are the things the West could do, but chooses not to. And the fuck you to all buyers of Russian oil still stands. I don’t care how poor they are.

      • @eatCasserole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Oh yeah, it’s just fun to imagine murdering a bunch of civilians, who have absolutely no say in whose oil just sailed into their harbour. Disgusting.

        Would you rather buy Saudi oil? American oil? Yeah, like that’s any better.

      • @bomibantai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        “…these are the things the West could do, but chooses not to.” Yeah, the West does whatever TF it’s done in Afghanistan, Iraq, West Asia, whatever France has done in Africa. “fuck you to all buyers of Russian oil” You mean like the US and EU? What do u think happens to the Russian oil once it’s refined to actual useful oil?

        • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The US and EU might buy a little, but most of it is being bought by China, India, and Africa at a steep discount. As I’m sure you know. Everybody buying Russian oil deserves scorn, even if they are living in the EU or the US.

          • @bomibantai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Lol first of all thats not true, please post any source and try to group by EU, China, India and Africa.

            And what about the other point? Does Russia also need western democracy? Is that before or after Greenland?

            • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 months ago

              Afghanistan and Iraq were terrible mistakes. And many (most?) NATO states had nothing to do with Iraq. Not that it matters right now. I’m talking about Russia’s imperialism right now.

        • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Throughout the deeply stupid and shameful invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and this is true, the US never detonated a cargo ship sized bomb killing ten thousand people in a busy port city just because they bought sanctioned oil.

        • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Spoiler: Russia did the same thing in .ost of those regions, too.

          Hell, they just did a speed run of Afghanistan, before we did… hence the nickname “Graveyard of Empires”.

  • @Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 months ago

    They are russian flagged vessels right? What does that mean in terms of ability to do things about them?

    I assume you can’t legally just board/sink them, even with cause?

    • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 months ago

      They are russian flagged vessels right?

      No, this specific ship is registered in the Cook Islands.

        • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes and no delaware are for giving as little as possible back and Panama is when they want to take money from people and not give any back

          It’s not the same with boats just a home port thing

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      Edit: I thought that the gulf of Finland was narrower than it is, and this affects the relevance of my comment. See boredtortoise’s reply below

      Under UNCLOS at least, a country can board a ship within its territorial waters to investigate a crime “if the consequences of the crime extend to the coastal State” (and some other reasons). Sinking it is almost certainly illegal, but it’s an unarmed ship and Finland has marines so I can’t imagine that they’d have much trouble boarding it if they wanted to

      • @boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        The boat was caught on international waters without an anchor when the event happened. The Coast guard asked it kindly to move into Finnish waters where the police boarded the boat with the border guard giving a chopper ride.

        No marine equivalents were actually needed which has the benefit of the apprehension not being a military action which could’ve easily been made escalatory in propaganda.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Ahh shit, I had just assumed that the gulf of Finland was narrow enough that it was all someone’s territorial water, but it isn’t. Thanks for the correction, I will edit a note into my comment

          Regarding the marines thing, that was not because I thought Finland actually had used them, more an “if the crew actually did try to fight about it, Finland is quite capable of winning that fight”

      • @Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Ty, I was expecting them to be russian flagged to ‘dare’ NATO to mess with them as an excuse to do… Something

  • shoulderoforion
    link
    fedilink
    92 months ago

    “travel bans”? huh. you’d think the finish would be aware if russia wants their people back, and those people are free to roam the streets, they’re gonna come and get em. these fuckers should be in jail, safely behind bars until trial.

      • @kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        We can dump them in a rowboat near Russias border. Keeping them just means feeding them. They are not worth the food.

    • @Taalen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      The crew isn’t Russian though. Just hired help that don’t care too much what they’re paid to do. Russia doesn’t care about their fate.

      • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Indeed. I for one would like these ass hats to have a good look at the culture they were so willing to fuck with, for such little money. The best view is not from a prison cell.

  • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    Pay them to sabotage the infrastructure of Russia and its allies. Plainly all this crew wants is money.