• @secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    313 months ago

    That’s just plain dumb. I usually don’t install rpm packages with the store but I frequently update my system from it. If they remove rpm support then they remove a huge ease of use feature.

    • youmaynotknow
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      My case is the other way around. I look for software in the store, and if I can’t find it, then I install from the terminal, but I always update (and remove) from terminal. I’m a diehard Gnome user, but this will certainly make me move to something else.

      Now, in flatpak’s defense, it’s great to keep browsers away from my system, as well as some other inconsequential apps that have no business integrating with my system. I like flatpak’s for these use cases. Everything else, I need my RPMs.

  • qaz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    273 months ago

    But why? It’s job is to install software, why make it worse by supporting less package formats?

    • @pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      But why?

      Probably because having two separate dependency management solutions can lead to a lot of needless headaches.

      And it makes particular sense for Gnome to switch over, since Gnome is focused on user space apps. Flatpaks should generally be more relevant and lower risk, long term, since they don’t require root privileges to install.

    • @TxTechnician@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      113 months ago

      Really? Why not?

      I find them incredibly useful for some applications.

      For some development stuff, though, I still prefer to use the installed version.

      So VS Code, for example, I have that installed.

      The flat pack just does not work as well.

      But Podman Desktop, which is a flat pack, is just excellent.

      • @embed_me@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        I think they use up too much space. I primarily use laptops with limited SSD storage and using flatpak has come back to bite me a couple of times.

        • @verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          83 months ago

          The space becomes less and less of an issue the more of your system is in flatpaks, as any shared dependencies won’t be duplicated.

        • @bluee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          In this part, I agree, company laptop only provide 256 usable 234gb, and well… it doesn’t works great if I use a lot of flatpak apps for now, So I opt to use rpms… if 512, it will be different…

    • @Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That is fucking stupid, but mostly because why on Earth should you drop a valid package format plenty of people use? Forcing rpm out will force people to use dnfdragora for that, creating two different app stores for one distribution.

      Flatpaks are IMO good and are a great option for a casual user who doesn’t want to accidentally screw up their system. Fully packed isolated dependencies, permission systems and other features make them great in many ways.

    • @Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Ok here is a bit of a rant Fr, Especially on Arch based distros where the Aur (which is wayy better) exists + I don’t use gnome I use Cinnamon(Gnome done right)

  • Negborz
    link
    fedilink
    43 months ago

    I really don’t like how gnome is doing things, even I not using a distro that uses rpm im considering migrate to cosmic