• @Chefdano3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    918 days ago

    Rome didn’t aggressively expand. It was very unroman to be the aggressor in a war, they only attack in self defense.

    It’s not Rome’s fault that all their neighbors happen to pose a threat to Rome by having the ability to attack, forcing Rome to preemptively attack them in self defense.

    The responsibility of governing the territory that was left over after their enemy’s defeat just happens to fall on Rome since nobody else was around to do it.

    • @PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      818 days ago

      So very true, and it’s sad that so many polities chose to unlawfully defend themselves in the process! What else could Rome do but sack their cities and sell them into slavery for such an offense??

      Lucky that those poor barbarians ran into the Romans, instead of a less generous and magnanimous people 🙏

  • Aielman15
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 days ago

    Step 1: Conquer new lands.

    Step 2: The soldiers demand payment.

    Step 3: Conquer new lands to pay the soldiers.

    I think I just discovered infinite growth!