• @Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1262 years ago

    Remember kids, don’t ever plug something in to your computer that you don’t trust or are unsure about. Picking up flashdrive off the street and plugging them in is one of the easiest ways to get malware installed on your computer.

  • Engywook
    link
    fedilink
    58
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Let’s hope these don’t carry Linux ISOs, which would be a very problematic drug to deal with.

  • Cicraft
    link
    fedilink
    352 years ago

    I might be dumb but how many books would 64gbs mean

    • @Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      38
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’d say roughly 1,000 to 100,000, depending on format.

      Edit: Raw ASCII (7-bit) could give you up to ~half a million.

      Edit 2: According to Randall Munroe (to lazy to find the source), you could theoretically store one word letter per bit. That would give us up to ten two million books.

      • @takeda@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        222 years ago

        Edit 2: According to Randall Munroe (to lazy to find the source), you could theoretically store one word letter per bit. That would give us up to ten two million books.

        I don’t see how that is possible, I think it is be one letter per byte.

        Bit only represents one state 1 or 0, or true or false. It is too little information to store a letter.

          • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            That’s based on common entropy limits of written information. It’s also why I always Bachelor domestic extended doubtful as concerns at. Morning prudent removal an letters by. On could my in order never it. Or excited certain sixteen it to parties colonel. Depending conveying direction has led immediate. Law gate her well bed life feet seen rent. On nature or no except it sussex.

            Of on affixed civilly moments promise explain fertile in. Assurance advantage belonging happiness departure so of. Now improving and one sincerity intention allowance commanded not. Oh an am frankness be necessary earnestly advantage estimable extensive. Five he wife gone ye. Mrs suffering sportsmen earnestly any. In am do giving to afford parish settle easily garret.

        • Doctor xNo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          That’s bit, a letter or character is a byte (8 bits), this is about right for pure text files that have no overhead, any extra info (like font, size, type, anything except which chatacter…) Is extra bytes, of course.

          • @jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            If we’re only talking 26 letters no caps, we can cut that down to 5 bits. Then use a decent compression algorithm. Someone more bored than I am can do the math.

            • @Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              five bits would only leaves us with six punctuation marks (including spaces, and we don’t get any numerals either) though, do you think that’s enough? i certainly don’t; i have not even used a full stop and I have already exceeded it!

      • @Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        One letter per bit? You’d need some crazy effective compression algorithm for that, because a bit is 1 or 0. Did you mean byte?

        • @AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          UTF-8 and ASCII are normally already 1 character per byte. With great file compression, you could probably reach 2 characters per byte, or one every 4 bits. One character every bit is probably impossible. Maybe with some sort of AI file compression, using an AI’s knowledge of the English language to predict the message.

          Edit: Wow, apparently that already exists, and it can achieve even higher of a compression ratio, almost 10:1! (with 1gb of UTF-8 (8 bit) text from Wikipedia) bellard.org/nncp/

          If an average book has 70k 5 character words, this could compress it to around 303 kb, meaning you could fit 1.6 million books in 64 gb.

          You can get a 2tb ssd for around $70. With this compression scheme you could fit 52 million books on it.

          I’m not sure if I’ve interpreted the speed data right, but It looks like it would take around a minute to decode each book on a 3090. It would take about a year to encode all of the books on the 2tb ssd if you used 50 a100s (~$9000 each). You could also use 100 3090s to achieve around the same speed (~$1000 each)

          52 million books is around the number of books written in the past 20 years, worldwide. All stored for $70 (+$100k of graphics cards)

          • @Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            There’s something comical about the low low price of $70 (+$100k of graphics cards) still leaving out the year of time it will take.

            • Cicraft
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Well I guess you could sacrifice a portion for an index system and just decode the one you’re trying to read

    • H3‎
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      a shitload. 64000 if it were simple text only stuff with 1MB per book, 640 if it were 100MB chonkers full of images

      • @Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        yeah i read mostly sci fi books so around like 300-400 pages all text and i’d say the average e-book for them is like 150-200kb’s so if it were books like that you’d be looking at stuffing like 300,000 books on there.

  • @Devouring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    As long as they’re not books on kinky sex that you share with kids because you’re pure evil, I support you.

  • Black Xanthus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    I would be very interested in the list of banned books, and how it would be curated.

    For 64gb, you might have to extend the years to be: banned books ever, and then break down that list by reason. Just to fill space you’d end up including dubious books, and you’d need to be clear on where/who/why a book got banned.

    A book being ‘banned’ from a pre-school for being ‘not age appropriate’ by some pointless helicopter parent wouldn’t count unless the book was actually age appropriate.

    Then you would need a category of ‘banned by author banned’(or similar). Books that were considered age appropriate at the time, but now definitely aren’t. I’m thinking here of the recent removal/editing of Dr Seuss books to remove problematic racial stereotype. Not necessarily banned in their original form, perhaps, but still censored (perhaps, rightly so for the target age).

    64GB is a lot of books. You would end up even including ‘The tale of (Darth) Pelagius’

    (Pelagius was considered a heretic in the early years of the church, and his writings were banned)

  • Doctor xNo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Must be bad books? Usually banned books are a good thing. Learn what nobody wants you to know! 😅

    Or am I missing some kind of sarcasm here? 😅

    • @Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      I guess you mean “Mein Kampf”? And no, the people who are into banning books are very much OK with that one.

    • @ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Either censored by the government or self-censored by the library/institution as the case may be. It’s truly a process as old as writing itself.

      In the case of kids specifically I would probably limit it to age appropriate reading material, which Hitler’s angry prison manifesto really isn’t…

      That being said there are a few hard hitting children’s books about the holocaust, and those actually are on banned books lists.

    • @Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Mien Kalf can only be read as ‘my calf’ or a woman with the first name Mien and last name Kalf in Dutch. Mien being pronounced like ‘mean’.

      Mein is pronounced to rhyme with nine. The ‘ei’ only being correctly pronounced in American when saying Einstein, other -steins get mispronounced to rhyme with ‘lean’ (Weiner as Weener instead of whiner fi).

      So we’ve got ‘mein’, to rhyme with nine, and Kampf, which might look like it’s out of your comfort zone, but it’s pronounced like comfort without the -ort.

      Didn’t intend for this to become a German pronunciation lesson using dictatorial literature, but there we are…

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        If Kampf is pronounced “comf” does that mean the English words, “comfy” or “comfortable” come from the German word for “struggle”?

        • @Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Nah, not at all.

          To be fair, it only really works with the american accent, where the ‘o’ in comfortable gets pronaunced a bit like an a. In British english it leans more to ‘u’.

          Comfortable is from latin ‘to strengthen or to help’. Com (cum) Force (forte) (maybe the british pronounciation is more correct because of the latin ‘cum’ :).

          German Kampf is related to camp, which would mean a military kamp, but also a battle. It gets translated to ‘struggle’ in English, but ‘My Battle’ or ‘My Fight’ would be more correct, albeit less litererary pleasing.

          • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Ah, okay. I was wondering if it was a silly reason like, “it’s a struggle to do anything when you’re comfy” or something like that.

            • @Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              As a rule, when speculating etymological relations, always look at the spelling rather than the pronunciation, since the latter tends to change a lot more quickly. English, of course, is an extreme case of this; during the Great Vowel Shift spellings stayed much the same while most vowels changed to the point of becoming unrecognisable. This is the main reason why English spelling makes no sense.

          • @Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Remember to always provide context when describing pronunciation in English. The letter u may be realised /jʉw/ (“use”), /ʉw/ (“rule”), /ɵ/ (“put”) and /ʌ/ (“cut”), of which only the last one is a valid approximation.

  • linuxgator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    I always thought it would be funny if someone were to get some individually packaged Gillette Mach 3 razors and put them in the buckets of kids who look old enough to shave.