• @SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 years ago

    They “solved” their population explosion with the one child rule. Can’t wait to see how they “solve” this new population problem.

  • @Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    I don’t think any country has liberated women and increased birthrates after have they?

    • @GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Thats not the reason, but economics is. For example Korea and Japan – where the gender norms are pretty conservative – have a lot lower birthrate than Sweden – one of the most equal countries. It more depends on wealth being the most important factor, social security systems and workforce participation of women.

      So either avoid getting wealthy, get a lot of immigration or get the social security systems in place to make it easy getting kids.

  • @SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    It’s only a matter of time before it becomes mandatory.

    Xi’s policies were on this path a while

  • Sagrotan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    Chinese government has to start a “new trend of free speech” for example

  • @Xavier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    I think it is too late to avoid the workforce and demographic squeeze.

    Considering the following simple thought experiment:

    1. Even if every abled, capable and freely willing women in China were immediately given:
    • 1.a. unlimited financial support

    • 1.b. complete freedom in choosing their partner

    • 1.c. flexible maternity leave (2 to 5 years)

    • 1.d. readily available at home cleaning and at home cooking/cartering services

    • 1.e. best in class psychological and medical services and follow ups

    • 1.f. excellent daycare and world class education;

      1. the first children born the following year won’t be able to work and contribute to the economy until 18 years later (or whenever they enter the workforce; at best 14 and ideally at 23-25 after university).

    Hence, I am inclined to suppose that, at best (least controversial), the Chinese Com·unist Part.y could do is to try and attenuate the economic slowdown and decay. How? I do not know.

    At worst, they implode on themself and/or start a looks-like-we-are-doing-something war.