For some women in China, “Barbie” is more than just a movie — it’s also a litmus test for their partner’s views on feminism and patriarchy.

The movie has prompted intense social media discussion online, media outlets Sixth Tone and the China Project reported this week, prompting women to discuss their own dating experiences.

One user on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu — a photo-sharing site similar to Instagram that’s mostly used by Gen Z women — even shared a guide on Monday for how women can test their boyfriends based on their reaction to the film.

According to the guide, if a man shows hatred for “Barbie” and slams female directors after they leave the theatre, then this man is “stingy” and a “toxic chauvinist,” according to Insider’s translation of the post. Conversely, if a man understands even half of the movie’s themes, “then he is likely a normal guy with normal values and stable emotions,” the user wrote.

  • @tenitchyfingers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 years ago

    Correct. Honestly, if a dude gets offended by a movie that says “hey dude, learn how to love and value yourself without basing all of your sense of self on your romantic relationship to a woman and you’ll be much happier”, they are NOT a catch at all and they need to shed some shit about their lives.

      • @MossBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        I agree that Chinese women being more progressive is a threat to the conservative Chinese government.

        • @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I mean, actual Marxist thought is explicitly feminist, at least under the definition that women are the intellectual and legal equals of men. The Soviets, for all their flaws, flipped one of the most rigid patriarchies in the world into one with… Well, some semblance of women’s liberation.

          And whatever other societal problems they have, or whether you can even call them Marxists, China isn’t attacking womens’ right to not die to a miscarriage.

          • @MossBear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I’m not overly familiar with that aspect of Marxism, but I can certainly believe it. I can’t imagine that a philosophy with hundreds if not thousands of aspects to it, would be completely without merit, even if the whole is flawed.

  • •••
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    That’s interesting. I read that the film was about radical feminism, but gender switched with Ken as the feminist to overthrow the Barbie-dominating system. Really look forward to seeing the movie.

    • @hawkguy@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      I think that analogy doesn’t work a 100 %. But I guess you could say that the film explores something like that.

      But go ahead and watch the film. I enjoyed it very much.

    • @ANALHACKER_3000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      I thought the movie was exceedingly clever and is a shining example of how sometimes a message is more about what it doesn’t say that what it does.

      That being said, the movie is definitely a rorschach test and you will see what you are primed to believe reflected in it.

    • @PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      My understanding is that the film undercuts most of its social commentary and ends up a wash, so watch it for the absurd interpretation of barbie life.

      • Yeather
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        It’s also incredibly ham fisted and decides to tell and not show. The jokes were pretty funny though.

  • Arotrios
    link
    fedilink
    292 years ago

    I have to admit, Barbie becoming a Chinese feminist icon was not on my 2023 bingo card. Anyone taking bets on when we’re gonna get a kpop version of this classic?

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It is in my very unbiased opinion that is totally not a promotion (as that would be against strike rules) that everybody should see this movie.

    Multiple times.

  • @spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    I think if anyone gets mad at a Barbie movie or some random article on the internet that has nothing to do with them, that’s a good sign they’re emotionally unstable

    • @oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      I’d call it emotionally immature.

      A surprising number of the people I grew up or work with act like they’re still in high school when it comes to social/interpersonal skills – these people are all well over 30 years old.

    • zeroxxx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      People are free to be mad at anything as they please as long as they dont harm to other people.

      Or maybe people should not be mad at news article of Russia invading Ukraine for no reason?

  • @Phoebe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    My boyfriend and i can’t wait to watch this movie 😊 💕 (but cinema got expensiv dudeee 🥲)

  • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    Someone tell me gf that I’m a normal guy with normal values and stable emotions please. She doesn’t believe me.

  • SimplyChad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    Just commenting to beg the universe to get the “I’m just Ken” song out of my head.

  • @cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    It’s that a bad translation, why would that mean men are “stingy”.

    I’d be stingy if I made my date pay for me to come with her, but not for disliking the movie.

    Watching one movie then going on about female directors sounds toxic though.

    • @Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Looks like the Chinese word for stingy literally translates to “narrow” but can also mean closed-minded or petty depending on context. A very plausible mistranslation.

    • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Some Asians (in my experience singaporeans and some Chinese) don’t understand the definition of stingy, in my experience. They use it to describe a lot of things that don’t involve money.

      • Nix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No it’s not lol

        Their political leaders are billionaires, the workers don’t own any means of production, there’s terrible workers rights, etc.

        • @whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          That’s how communism always ends up. When you hand over majority of the power to the state, it won’t be keen on giving it back.

          That’s like saying the US is not capitalist because we don’t have a true free market and better products/services don’t always rise to the top.

          These simply aren’t things that can practically happen, just like the workers owning the means of production.

          • @Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            That doesn’t make any sense though. Communism isn’t when you “give power to the state.” It’s a word used to describe a specific economic system that China does not have. The word that best describes what I think you’re getting at is “authoritarian.” Words mean things, and if a thing doesn’t fit the definition of a word, then it isn’t that word.

            • BombOmOm
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              Which communist state didn’t end up authoritarian?

              • @Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Homie, which states have ever actually implemented communism? Calling yourself “Communist” means about as much as North Korea calling themselves a" Democratic People’s Republic" if you don’t actually implement it’s ideas.

                Additionally, all attempts at democracy, and all instances of capitalism, have resulted in tyranny, because it’s just really hard to build a society that doesn’t do that no matter what governmental system and economic system you set out to establish.

                Even places like New Zealand or the Nordic countries which are much closer to a social democracy are tyrannical insofar as they participate, propagate, and benefit from a global network of capitalism that is only possible through the exploitation of hundreds millions, if not billions of people. Outsourcing your tyranny and exploitation to other places on the planet is still tyranny.and exploitation: it just has better PR.

                • BombOmOm
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 years ago

                  which states have ever actually implemented communism?

                  Ah, no true communism. Communism certainly can’t end up authoritarian if there is no true communism. ;p