Microsoft are looking at putting datacenters under the ocean, which sounds like a really good idea to cool them but I can’t help but think a couple decades from now it’s going to start causing us problems

  • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Well it’s certainly better environmentally than using conventional air conditioning, doubt it would heat up the oceans significantly

    • Brkdncr
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Would it heat up the oceans: yes.

      Significantly:no.

      If this pans out it would be a lot better than what we are doing now.

    • @lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      The container is regarded as a single unit; if a server inside the container fails the functions of that server are offloaded to another available server and it is taken out of service.

      Once enough servers in a container are offline the entire unit has all computational load offloaded to another, identical container with sufficient capacity.

      Then the now-offline unit is retrieved and serviced; probably a ground-up rebuild of all components.

      … but I do like the idea of some dude in a wetsuit trying to replace a memory stick.

        • @towerful@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          The salt water won’t come into contact with anything except pumps, a heat exchanger and the exterior of the container.
          The servers live in a nitrogen environment, so it reduces corrosion, I doubt there would be any dirt or dust. It’s going to be an incredible sterile environment.

  • EnderWi99in
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Why would this be a bad thing? Doubt it happens at any scale but this seems like a perfectly viable way to cool data centers compared to how energy intensive they are today.

          • @Souvlaki@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            I’m sure the engineers who made this know. And if they didn’t, this is an article from 2018, they would have most certainly found out by now.

            • @CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              Which makes you wonder why there’s no update because this is something that we’ve known about for thousands of years and still need to constantly repaint boats because the ocean doesn’t give a fuck.

              • @flashgnash@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Maybe they’re able to use different materials? After all boats need to float so maybe they need to use lighter, less durable materials and have thinner walls

                These things could be made as dense and thick as needed because they explicitly need not to float