The national security dimension of OpenAI's leadership struggle — LessWrong
www.lesswrong.com
As the very public custody battle over OpenAI's artificial intelligences winds down, I would like to point out a few facts, and then comment briefly…

Found this because an article on Helen Toner popped up in my feed and I wanted to find out more, and boy did I find out more.

  • @Amoeba_GirlEnglish
    16•7 months ago

    Those are my facts. Now for my interpretation.

    This is going to haunt me for a while.

    • @swlabrOPEnglish
      13•7 months ago

      Dread it; run from it; my interpretation arrives all the same.

    • @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      6•7 months ago

      paragraph before that is also special

      Either way, this means that the EAs on the board, who both presumably voted to oust Sam Altman as CEO, are adjacent to the US intelligence community, and/or its critics, many of whom are intelligence veterans anyway.

      • @TinyTimmyTokyoEnglish
        8•7 months ago

        All factual and counter-factual statements are evidence for my position. Heads I win, tails you lose.

    • @carlitoscohonesEnglish
      6•7 months ago

      LOL. One board member is in the CIA “milieu” because of her college major, another has a husband who played Edward Snowden, and they both “presumably” voted to oust Sam Altman. With that kind of rock-solid fact pattern, you just know the reasoning is going to be airtight.