HN reacts to a New Yorker piece on the “obscene energy demands of AI” with exactly the same arguments coiners use when confronted with the energy cost of blockchain - the product is valuable in of itself, demands for more energy will spur investment in energy generation, and what about the energy costs of painting oil on canvas, hmmmmmm???

Maybe it’s just my newness antennae needing calibrating, but I do feel the extreme energy requirements for what’s arguably just a frivolous toy is gonna cause AI boosters big problems, especially as energy demands ramp up in the US in the warmer months. Expect the narrative to adjust to counter it.

  • @RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Your “frivolous toy” argument interested me, apparently video games use 34 TWh a year

    If the random dude on HN is to be believed chatGPT uses 182M kWh or 0.182TWh a year.

    Not sure what to make of that.

    • David GerardMA
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      christmas lights bring people actual joy

      again, this is literally a reskinned bitcoiner argument

      • @swlabr
        link
        English
        134 months ago

        More👏power👏for👏vibrators👏