For thursday’s sentencing the us government indicated they would be happy with a 40-50 prison sentence, and in the list of reasons they cite there’s this gem:

  1. Bankman-Fried’s effective altruism and own statements about risk suggest he would be likely to commit another fraud if he determined it had high enough “expected value”. They point to Caroline Ellison’s testimony in which she said that Bankman-Fried had expressed to her that he would “be happy to flip a coin, if it came up tails and the world was destroyed, as long as if it came up heads the world would be like more than twice as good”. They also point to Bankman-Fried’s “own ‘calculations’” described in his sentencing memo, in which he says his life now has negative expected value. “Such a calculus will inevitably lead him to trying again,” they write.

Turns out making it a point of pride that you have the morality of an anime villain does not endear you to prosecutors, who knew.

Bonus: SBF’s lawyers’ list of assertions for asking for a shorter sentence includes this hilarious bit reasoning:

They argue that Bankman-Fried would not reoffend, for reasons including that “he would sooner suffer than bring disrepute to any philanthropic movement.”

  • @swlabr
    link
    English
    183 months ago

    morality of an anime villain

    Plenty of anime villains would be insulted by this.

    IANAL: His defense team must truly suck ass. To let the prosecution build the case that he is essentially amoral and profit driven is just baffling. To let SBF speak in any capacity at all is more baffling. The only way they could bungle this further is if they asked for more time than the prosecution was asking for.

    • @ArchiteuthisOP
      link
      English
      233 months ago

      If I remember correctly SBF taking the stand was completely against his lawyers’ recommendations, and in general he seems to have a really hard time doing what people who know better tell him to, such as don’t DM journalists about your crimes and definitely don’t start a substack detailing how you felt justified in doing them, and also trying to ‘explain yourself’ to prosecution witnesses is witness tampering and will get your bail revoked.

      • @swlabr
        link
        English
        153 months ago

        A really good lawyer carries duct tape

        • David GerardMA
          link
          English
          153 months ago

          At several points, if Sam’s lawyer had jumped across the courtroom and knocked him out with a single punch to the face, it would have been best fulfilling their duty to their client and as officers of the court.

      • @Soyweiser
        link
        English
        93 months ago

        Wonder if that gets taken into account if that was an example of ‘he does calculations in his head to do insane shit like not listen to his lawyers to shut the fuck up’.

    • David GerardMA
      link
      English
      173 months ago

      There’s a limit to what anyone can achieve with this calibre of client. This is also his second defence team after the others refused to put up with his shit any more. He has a new, third defence team handling his appeal.

      • @Soyweiser
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Is he the type of guy to go ‘wait if I just explain my stance more and more they will eventually understand’?

        Did he try to Rationalist blogpost monologue his defence team because he also wanted to do that to the judge? The idea of him trying to verbose from first principles the law in his own defense sounds very funny to me. Poor lawyers

        E: Officially perjured himself 3 times. Oof.

        • David GerardMA
          link
          English
          123 months ago

          i expect that if you listened to the water pipes in MDC Brooklyn, you could hear SBF tapping out a full explanation of his crimes in Morse code, especially why it was all Caroline’s fault

          • @Soyweiser
            link
            English
            113 months ago

            Come on, that comes in the book soon to be released from prison. Also included in the book, how he is justified in hating books and all who read them as all his book smart lawyers gave him 30 years in prison on the appeal!

            • David GerardMA
              link
              English
              93 months ago

              by Michael Lewis, published by Kindle Print

          • Charlie Stross
            link
            fedilink
            93 months ago

            @dgerard @sneerclub he’s gonna start a Basilisk cult in prison, isn’t he. Get out in 25 years and head straight for the executive suite in the temple his followers will have built for him.

            • @froztbyte
              link
              English
              103 months ago

              I expect we’ll soon hear the laments of how prison impacts ev, maybe combined with some utterly twisted argument for prison abolition (along with their own deeply fucked replacement suggestion)

                • @froztbyte
                  link
                  English
                  93 months ago

                  well, that’s certainly an “attempt was made”-grade opinion

              • David GerardMA
                link
                English
                93 months ago

                the important point is that prison abolition should start with financial so-called “'”‘“crimes”’“'”,

                  • David GerardMA
                    link
                    English
                    73 months ago

                    that’s why they specifically put in how Sam ripped off his investors too

            • David GerardMA
              link
              English
              53 months ago

              oh god he totally will won’t he