@jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 2 months agoThe Supreme Court is about to have a very busy weekwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down10
arrow-up1121arrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court is about to have a very busy weekwww.motherjones.com@jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareFenrirIIIlinkfedilink4•2 months agoTheir ruling would have to be incredibly narrow and focused exclusively on Trump’s crimes in order to not apply to any other presidents, unless they commit the same crimes as detailed in the ruling.
minus-squaregradyplinkEnglish3•2 months agogiven the way they have been ruling lately, and given the schedule, this is what I’m expecting.
minus-square@disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 months agoI see. So it’s unlikely to see exclusivity without exceptional bias, and more likely will be applicable to future presidents if passed?
Their ruling would have to be incredibly narrow and focused exclusively on Trump’s crimes in order to not apply to any other presidents, unless they commit the same crimes as detailed in the ruling.
given the way they have been ruling lately, and given the schedule, this is what I’m expecting.
I see. So it’s unlikely to see exclusivity without exceptional bias, and more likely will be applicable to future presidents if passed?