• @selfA
    link
    English
    219 months ago

    Edit 2: since there’s no consensus on this I’m just going to reify that fact via the trailing-question-mark trick and call it a day.

    Since killing != killed, your comment already shows that the title is misleading.

    (That has a beneficial side effect btw: not having my own opinion about a story makes it easier to not moderate according to my own opinion. I still do that, or try my best to, even when I do have an opinion—but it takes more ATP.)

    danny, please log the fuck off

    • @froztbyte
      link
      English
      169 months ago

      “You see, if I don’t …[pausemassive bong hit]…get involved, right? If I don’t get involved …[pausewalks to table, grabs a keg, slams it in one go]… then I by default can’t be subjected to the problem! [does line of coke off side of now-empty keg] And this way, I can always be perfectly neutral! [coke kicks in] This is how I manage to make HN be so central to everything!”

      • @o7___o7
        link
        English
        109 months ago

        “Tell my wife I said…hello.”

        –dang’s last words, probably

        • David GerardOPMA
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          * “hello?”

          also his name is dang? now

          • @selfA
            link
            English
            109 months ago

            my new gimmick for the occasions I have to post on the orange site is seeing how many question marks I can add to my thread titles and comments before I get shadowbanned

            • @froztbyte
              link
              English
              59 months ago

              what if … whitespace … and predicate logic…? we could call it ? 🥹👉👈

    • @jax
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      trailing-question-marks: the consensus bypassing trick anarchists don’t want you to know?