• @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

        • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

          Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

          I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

            • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

              I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

                • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges… It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

                  You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?