• @unscholarly_source@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Your original reply stated that “including heated seats and making you pay once to access it is fair game” is what prompted my reply. Users shouldn’t be paying for it if it comes with the product, disabled or not.

    I have no qualms about subscriptions for FSD due to continuing developments and improvements, and the fact that it requires a service running AI/ML models to operate. However the drastic subscription cost changes over 3 years raises an eyebrow. From $5000 in 2019 to $15000 in 2022 is quite a drastic change. They certainly have the right to price how they want, but definitely an insane pricing model.

    • NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If your problem with my statement is that Tesla shouldn’t even be allowed to charge them for it in the first place then we’ll have to disagree. They can sell whatever product they want with features locked away. If people don’t want to buy a SR because it doesn’t have heated seats without a fee then don’t buy it.

      Trying to make heated seats a subscription is where I’d draw the line and say regulators should step in.

      And again, no qualms with people jailbreaking heated seats

      • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I see where you’re coming from. And I also agree with the subscription heated seats.

        I think we might actually be advocating for the same thing lol. I was making the argument that manufacturers should have a one-time price for things that are packaged along with the product (with the exception of features like FSD that requires a continuing service to operate and evolve), but jailbreaking static features like heated seats is fair game.

        However, your post got me thinking… If it is reasonable for FSD to be a subscription model, how are FSD updates different than, let’s say, your phone having updates and security patches? We don’t currently pay for new versions of iOS or Android. Granted the complexity and stake of FSD is greater than a phone, it is similar fundamentally

        • NotMyOldRedditName
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We don’t pay for phone updates, but there is software out there that’s a buy a version and get all updates to that version, but not a new version.

          E.g buy 5.0, get 5.1, 5.2, 5.2.1, 5.3 etc but not 6.0

          Usually that kinda software stays on a version for years.

          My Jetbrains IDE is a subscription fee like that. Yearly fee gets you all major version updates, but you keep it as is if you stop paying.

          Phone updates don’t come for the life of the car phone either.

          Would you pay a yearly fee to continue getting updates for your now no longer being updated but perfectly fine otherwise phone? I would.

          • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Would you pay a yearly fee to continue getting updates for your now no longer being updated but perfectly fine otherwise phone? I would.

            Good question. At that point I’d explore replacing the OS altogether with GapheneOS or LineageOS.

            When it comes to cars though, I don’t find FSD an appealing enough value to continue paying (or even begin to pay in the first place). But to your point, that doesn’t mean Tesla shouldn’t price it how they want and people to buy it if they wish.