• @Soyweiser
    link
    English
    62 days ago

    Some 100 times+ compression, very fast and also at very low power (because it was inside the brain), and lossless.

    And not stated but because it was inside the brain, I assume possible memory usage also wasn’t that high etc. Sorry have no direct link to the specs.

    • @V0ldek
      link
      English
      72 days ago

      I assume possible memory usage also wasn’t that high

      ye iirc we can remember like 7 things so that might be hard /s

    • Jonathan Hendry
      link
      fedilink
      52 days ago

      @Soyweiser @V0ldek

      The multi-electrode systems at the lab I worked in 2009 used a fiber connection to the host PC and generated terabytes of data, for just 128 or 92 electrodes (I forget) at not-all-that-many samples per second.

      • @Soyweiser
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Sorry what is the point here? Or do you just want to share a cool story about data transfer? (I’m not trying to be snarky, I feel like im missing something here).