When you connect a new device to a ‘smart’ tv, you must pay homage to the manufacturer with a ritualistic dance. Plugging and unplugging the device. Turning them on and off in the correct sequence like entering a konami code.

Every time you want to switch devices, the tv must scan for them. And god forbid you lose power, or unplug something. You are granted the delight experience of doing it all over again.

I have fond memories of the days of just plugging something in, and pressing the input button. Instant gratification. It was a simpler time.

What is some other tech that used to be better?

  • BOFH666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cars.

    • mechanical, no software bugs
    • physical buttons, no touch screen
    • everything just worked, no need to license the heating of your chair
    • freaking lane assist

    You get it…

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lane assist and being able to control shit via voice or steering wheel buttons absolutely has helped with safety though. While lane assist is not going to completely prevent you from serving off the road if you pass out, it will happen much less often. Of course you should not drive while tired but people still do pretty often. Being able to change a radio station or call someone from steering wheel buttons is a hell of a lot safer than fiddling with a radio dial or searching for a CD/cassette to play. A girl in my high school died doing that one.

          Seat heating was not really a thing in anything but luxury models until pretty recently.

          I do agree about replacing controls with a touchscreen though. Fuck that. That is absolutely less safe than having tactile feedback.

          • oxjox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            The problem you’ve addressed is that too many people should not be driving or doing what they’re doing while they’re driving. All these safety features are really just ‘I’m too distracted to pay attention to operating a motor vehicle’ features.

            There absolutely is some technology that’s been beneficial. But the cat has been let out of the bag and people are losing the choice to safely operate a car on their own.

            • SeaJ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yeah, it turns out humans be humaning. We are not robots. You have the option to safely operate a car on your own but if you so happen to have an issue where you cannot operate one safely in the moment, the safety features help you out. You can still operate a vehicle with lane assist and not even notice that it is enabled. You also have the ability to turn it off. You can also still operate a vehicle with adaptive cruise control enabled and not even notice it if you are shaky operating the vehicle properly. These features do not prevent people from operating a vehicle safely on their own. They are there because a fuck ton of people cannot and never have been able to. The past driver mortality rate which was higher when these safety features were not an option is clear evidence of that.

              Again, if you are indeed a robot and have never had an issue of going over the lines or going above the speed limit or ever checked your rear view mirror at an inopportune time when someone in front of you is slamming on their brakes, you can still operate a vehicle just the same as you would if they were not there. Hell, you can also simply disable them. But those safety features are there for the rest of us that recognize that shit happens.

              Now I will certainly agree that many people should not be driving. I believe that you should have a hell of a lot more practice than six months of driver’s education and passing a very simple test once to be able to drive for the rest of your life. I also recognize that driving is a requirement for many people to work. I welcome alternatives to driving but it is not a reality yet. The increase in safety features helps minimize death and injury in the current reality.

              • oxjox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                operate a vehicle with lane assist and not even notice that it is enabled.

                I see this as the problem. We’re becoming more reliant on robots to accomplish basic tasks. If the mode of transportation is fully automated - fine. But that is not the case, yet. It’s still the licensed driver’s responsibility if there’s a crash. You can’t tell a judge your robot made a mistake.

                You know how they say Gen Alpha doesn’t know how to turn on a computer or use a file system? It’s like that. We can’t just give the robots full control of our lives. We should know the basics of operating a car, of being aware of our surroundings, of how to instinctively make a split second decision.

                I’ll offer a compromise. There should be two (or more) levels of operating licenses. If you want your car to do everything for you, you do not have the same permissions as someone who knows how to fully drive a car. This means you’re unable to rent or borrow a car that requires your full attention. At least this creates some sort of stricter legal ramification when someone who’s been dependent upon driver assist features for a decade and gets behind the wheel of a “dumb” car and kills someone because they don’t know how to merge onto a highway. Frankly, we could benefit from this premise on existing drivers and vehicles today.

            • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Even the most reliable drivers overlook something, get distracted by something on the road or in the car. These features absolutely help more than they harm.

        • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Of course not, what makes you think anything i said is even vaguely related to those negative cherry picks?

          Is car manufacturing and design not tech?

          Do impact detection, brake assist/auto brake, modern lane assist, distance detection etc not add to safety? I could probably rattle on

      • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Over the past 5 years the monthly road deaths here in aus have been going up, because of the prevalence of those massive cars

        • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah tbh there would be no harm in banning them. If you need a work truck, those are fine. No person in the world needs an SUV or an oversized pickup truck

            • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Not sure who would ever need an SUV, especially in an urban env. Most of the common ones have zero off roading capabilities either, so work vehicles are usually specialised.

              Thanks for the link though, I’ll forward it :)

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Cars are one of the first thing I would use as an example of something that’s gotten better. Heated seats, heated steering wheels, better safety ratings, better comfort, power windows, power steering, ABS, backup cameras, adaptive cruise control…

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Uh cars now have subscription services for various features. You dont just get whats in the car when you buy it second hand, you still have to pay to use those features.

        Repair costs are stupdily expensive in comparison, and require significant diagnostic tools to do simple things because everything in your car has a sensor in it.

        And cars are now spying on you to your insurance company because you dont actually get to decide if they are allowed to use your data or not

        Sure cars have a lot more features, but they used to just work

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh, I agree with your complaints. But that doesn’t change that cars offer a much more comfortable and convenient experience today than they did in my youth.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Reread what i wrote and thought about it today.

            What message im hoping to say is its all downhill from here. Autopilot and AI will be crammed into every piece of tech imaginable and car manufacturers tech has always been trash, I dont know what its going to look like at the bottom but weve gone over the cliff already and we wont know what its gonna look like in 15 years, but we will dream of what we have today.

            Ill bet you 1 dollar im not wrong

      • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah pretty much.

        Unless you want to build your own car from the ground up, which you can do in most places if it passes safety regulations. But that takes time, money, workspace and knowing what you’re even doing.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I just bought a 2013 Mini Copper. The tech is relatively limited but I have to admit there are some ergonomic issues - specifically with the lights, wipers, and radio controls. I installed a phone holder but I’m almost regretting it. I’m trying to retrain myself to not rely on gps for everything. Like, I shouldn’t need gps to tell me how to get to my mom’s house where I’ve driven to hundreds of times.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      A lot of the modern tech is really good, though.

      Cars are way more reliable than they were. They get way better gas mileage. They have a shitload more power (this is actually a con due to how everyone else drives these days). They’re way safer in both accidents and just general driving with traction control and lane departure warnings.

      So it’s a real mixed bag. But I’d rather have the cars of today.

      • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        The only thing that used to be better was more physical buttons. And it looks like the EU will be pushing for that to return (requiring more physical buttons for the highest security rating).

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I also prefer the old style heat/AC bar over the modern style where you set a temperature number. What’s the point of setting a temperature number when the car doesn’t actually maintain or output that particular temperature? For example, if it’s 70° out and I set my temperature control to 70°, it might blast cold air at me or hot air. It’s a crapshoot. The old style bar, you just set how warm or cool the air was that’s coming out of the vents and it didn’t change based on external temperature. So much simpler.

          But yeah, non-physical buttons are both inconvenient and hazardous.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Meanwhile, I have a car with a big touchscreen, and few physical buttons and it clearly doesn’t work.

        Here, with the exact same ammount of evidence you presented I proved you wrong!


        Back in Not-idiot land however, we know that neither one of us have proved anything, we are both presenting claims, with zero verifiable facts, which at best should be treated as unverified antecdotes.

      • brlemworld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not sure why you are getting down voted. I have a Tesla and agree. Now if you had that piece of shit Toyota EV (bzssrt?) then maybe I would agree with OP.

        • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          What I wanted to say is that a car’s quality doesn’t solely depend on if it’s got touch or physical controls but on **how ** good or bad they’re done. OP overly generalised that.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      And also:

      • No exhaust filters
      • Leaded fuel
      • No crash safety because rigid frames
      • Wat is errbeck?

      Yeah no sorry, as shitty as the software side of cars has become, the hardware is much advanced. And overall cars have become much better, though the recent trend towards SUVs gas removed a lot of those gains as we needlessly buy pricier and less safe cars that use more energy. 🤷 But that’s on us consumers, tons of non-SUVs to buy, we’re just not buying them.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is why I’m still driving my 1996 Volvo 940. I can fix most things on it myself (and I’m not even mechanically inclined), and it doesn’t have a boot time.