• sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    323 months ago

    We already have laws on the books for this but feds and state AGs refuse to enforce them.

    Harris must know this… The only people who don’t is the target audience. It appears

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      173 months ago

      If we have a law and we’re not enforcing it… isn’t it precisely the role of the executive branch to start enforcing it harder?

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        and they precisely won’t do it lol

        regime whores are not here to help wage slaves jfc

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You’d like to think so. But we’ve got ample evidence to suggest the role of the executive branch is to subsidize business regulation of itself.

      • @Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        What’s the point of stronger laws if the existing ones aren’t enforced? The stronger ones wouldn’t be enforced either.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        If she is a president, she can try to push for it sure…

        But my point is that if laws are not enforced as is, what would the benefit be anyway?

        We have rules against monopolies, we have rules against price gouging, we have some basic employment laws… Feds nor states will enforce them for benefit of the public.

        I think as president it would be way easier to step up enforcement but no president is willing tot use their political power to piss off our dear owners.