• Clifton Royston
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    @V0ldek @dgerard

    Yeah, there’s a number of people here who actually met Yarvin before he

    1. became a complete asshole, you can not even imagine,
    2. became a proud fascist and *monarchist*, and
    3. lost his mind.

    Many of us also have SW experience and have tried to look into Urbit and all came to the same conclusion - it all seems to be based on both giving stupid names to existing concepts, and blindly doing the opposite of whatever anybody has done before without regard to reason.

    • Clifton Royston
      link
      fedilink
      824 days ago

      @V0ldek @dgerard

      IIRC, a trivial but telling example of the latter is that for whatever reason, Yarvin decided that in all languages and code for all things Urbit, the boolean value true should be represented in binary form as 0, and false should be represented as non-zero.

      Now it’s fundamentally *arbitrary* whether 0 represents false or true, but deliberately making it the opposite of virtually every modern language implementation seems a perfect recipe for introducing unnecessary bugs.

      • @bitofhope
        link
        English
        624 days ago

        Bourne shell inspiring yet another language!

        • Clifton Royston
          link
          fedilink
          624 days ago

          @bitofhope

          Yeah, that was the only motivation I could think of. And even there it doesn’t mean true/false, it means “no errors” and that only sometimes.