• @blakestaceyA
    link
    English
    93 months ago

    People just out here acting like a fundamentally, inextricably unreliable and unethical technology has a “use case”

    smdh

    • @selfA
      link
      English
      83 months ago

      fucking right! there’s this unearned assumption that just because the tech’s been invented, it must have worth. and, like, no? there’s so many dead ends in science and technology, and notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

      and now I’m pissed and trying to decide if it’s even worth explicitly adding “don’t be a debatelord asshole” to the TechTakes sidebar, cause it’s not like they’re gonna stop

      • @blakestaceyA
        link
        English
        83 months ago

        “We’re not saying it doesn’t have its flaws, but you need to appreciate the potential of the radium cockring!”

      • @froztbyte
        link
        English
        73 months ago

        notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

        to wildly abword a phrase I’ve seen elsewhere: “idiocy can remain solvent longer than you can”