• @Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    757 months ago

    It’s sort of a strange approach, because this will leave you with the workers who can’t find employment elsewhere.

      • Skeezix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        277 months ago

        Most companies are satisfied with adequate workers rather than diligent and empowered workers. The latter cost too much. This is a convenient way for Amazon to cull the crew without incurring bad PR. This is why it’s often a shitshow in offices and warehouses; because the workers with self esteem and motivation either get fed up and leave or are forced out. This is just a facet of Big Capitalism.

    • @exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      227 months ago

      By the time that negative effect kicks in, the execs already cashed in their bonuses and are on their way out of the sinking ship

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 months ago

      Executives do not see workers as people with skillsets. They’re numbers on a spreadsheet. And having ten highly paid workers quit “voluntarily” makes the numbers do good things.

      Actually, they’re not even numbers on a spreadsheet. They’re data points in a graph. Executives don’t have time to understand numbers, let alone people.

    • @DrDickHandler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      People exaggerate this claim. Amazon already accounted for some talent leaving and the benefits obviously outweighs the con. There is nothing strange.