How about ANY FINITE SEQUENCE AT ALL?

      • cosecantphi [he/him, they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s implicitly defined here by its decimal form:

        0.101001000100001000001 . . .

        The definition of this number is that the number of 0s after each 1 is given by the total previous number of 1s in the sequence. That’s why it can’t contain 2 despite being infinite and non-repeating.

        • मुक्त
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          0.101001000100001000001 . . .

          Might very well be :

          0.101001000100001000001202002000200002000002 …

          Real life, is different from gamified questions asked in student exams.

          • cosecantphi [he/him, they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Implicitly defining a number via it’s decimal form typically relies on their being a pattern to follow after the ellipsis. You can define a different number with twos in it, but if you put an ellipsis at the end you’re implying there’s a different pattern to follow for the rest of the decimal expansion, hence your number is not the same number as the one without twos in it.

              • cosecantphi [he/him, they/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Math kind of relies on assumptions, you really can’t get anywhere in math without an assumption at the beginning of your thought process.

                • मुक्त
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  Obviously. But still maths avoids stuff like “I assume the answer is X. QED.”

                  • cosecantphi [he/him, they/them]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Right and the point of defining this number as a non-repeating infinite sequence of 0s and 1s is just to show that non-repetition of digits alone is not sufficient to say a number contains all finite sequences.